On Friday, February 08, 2013 12:33:14 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 03:57:42 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Rafael,
This is another unplanned patchset for all the platforms that i broke. :)
Okay, there are two important fixes (1 & 4) and two general cleanups (2 & 3). I hope most of the issues would be resolved by these and we would be able to push clean cpufreq core into 3.9.
I have pushed them in my for-rafael branch at:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git%3Ba=shortlog%3Bh=ref...
@Artem & Valdis: Please test them and reply with your Tested-by's (in case they work :) ).
Viresh Kumar (4): cpufreq: governors: Fix WARN_ON() for multi-policy platforms cpufreq: Remove unused HOTPLUG_CPU code cpufreq: Create a macro for unlock_policy_rwsem{read,write} cpufreq: Fix locking issues
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 32 ++++++---- 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
I should have done that before, sorry about it.
Can you please rework this series on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq and try to avoid introducing new issues this time?
If this works, we'll rebase all of the other new material on top of it, if possible.
I've dropped the pm-cpufreq-next branch from linux-next now, BTW.
Thanks, Rafael