Arnd Bergmann arnd.bergmann@linaro.org writes:
On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer. With lots of discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the not-so-distant future.
Hmm, according to the script, you are the maintainer ;-)
doh, I knew I should've kept quiet :/
$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c Kevin Hilman khilman@ti.com (commit_signer:8/10=80%) Len Brown len.brown@intel.com (commit_signer:7/10=70%) Trinabh Gupta g.trinabh@gmail.com (commit_signer:4/10=40%) Arjan van de Ven arjan@linux.intel.com (commit_signer:4/10=40%) Deepthi Dharwar deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com (commit_signer:4/10=40%)
While I realize that the get_maintainers.pl is not the final word, you could be the acting cpuidle maintainer for this merge window and send the pull request.
Not exactly the outcome I was hoping for (I have enough stuff to look after at the moment.)
However, if you think it would help and won't be seen as a take over attempt (I don't want to maintain CPUidle), I can possibly do it for this merge window.
Before doing that though, I'll need give this series a final once over before I'm willing to send a potentially flame-attracting pull request.
Kevin