On 03/31/2012 02:17 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 10:15 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
In that case, just go ahead and push the full config to the config tree. If we need to do have fullly-enabled vs upstream builds we can deal with the warnings in the latter case (or maybe further split the board configs into -upstream and -lt ?).
So this means Landing Teams should host the configs for their boards and you will host the linaro-base, ubuntu and android fragments?
I guess it depends on whats easiest. I'm fine hosting all the configs, if landing teams want to provide them to me. But if landing teams want to host them, that's fine too.
We almost certainly need board specific android and ubuntu fragments as well, so I'll add vexpress-android.conf and vexpress-ubuntu.conf as well. (Unless there is some magic to have conditional config options in a fragment?)
No, the config fragments are pretty simple, so there's no conditional logic in them. Your idea for a board-type.conf style split sounds like a fair idea. Although, I'm curious what would be an example of this?
thanks -john