On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq.
I already did. Please check for-rafael branch
Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then?
Moreover, I'd very much prefer it if you fixed the problems introduced by b8eed8a "cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()" separately and *then* any other locking problems you're seeing in the code, although people are not reporting them.
You seem to have a clear picture of how the code should work now, so that won't be a big trouble I guess.
For me all problems are fixed in the current code. :)
Sounds great. :-)
Thanks, Rafael