On 04/02/2012 12:59 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 03/31/2012 01:17 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 10:15 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
Right right right. I forgot with the new topic branch method, everything based on mainline and not a tree Andrey maintains, so you don't have a reference to the config tree.
Yes, Andrey's tree is a merge of all the LT and working group topics.
In that case, just go ahead and push the full config to the config tree. If we need to do have fullly-enabled vs upstream builds we can deal with the warnings in the latter case (or maybe further split the board configs into -upstream and -lt ?).
So this means Landing Teams should host the configs for their boards and you will host the linaro-base, ubuntu and android fragments?
We could have a separate topic branch for the linaro-base and ubuntu and fragments (not board specific), as there is no linaro-base or ubuntu topic in linux-linaro. Otherwise the generic features (not board specific) should also add the config fragments to their topic branches. So the android fragment could live in the android topic as well.
This is definitely the right way.
-Andy