On 13 September 2011 15:21, Loïc Minier loic.minier@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011, James Westby wrote:
What about taking a cue from gstreamer? good, bad and ugly I don't think we have the same division of them, but "ugly" could work, in a similar spirit to "dirty," but without some of the implications?
[ The names of course come from the movie, but sometimes GStreamer folks regretted picking these names because end-users didn't really understand why they should run something "bad" or even "ugly". ]
I agree. I really don't like to use the terms bad or ugly to describe work. I think it sets the wrong tone.
It sounds like staging is generally okay with people. I tend to take the view that its always possible to upstream the outstanding patches, though it may not be likely - the glass is half full, right?
-- Loďc Minier