On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:54:09PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
Driver for DA9052 battery charger. This driver depends on DA9052 MFD core dirver for definitions and methods.
Tested on Samsung SMDK6410 board with DA9052-BC and DA9053-BA evaluation boards.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen dchen@diasemi.com Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com
Ashish,
Much thanks for your work! The code itself looks OK to me. But there are some issues regarding readability and coding style. No big deal, but please consider fixing.
[...]
[..]
+static int da9052_battery_check_status(struct da9052_battery *battery,
int *status)
+{
- uint8_t v[2] = {0, 0};
- uint8_t bat_status, chg_end;
In kernel code we try to use 'uXX' types. I.e. u8 here.
- int ret, chg_current, chg_end_current;
Each declaration should be on its own line.
int ret; int chr_current;
- ret = da9052_group_read(battery->da9052, DA9052_STATUS_A_REG, 2, v);
- if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- bat_status = v[0];
- chg_end = v[1];
- /* Preference to WALL(DCIN) charger unit */
- if (((bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_DCINSEL) &&
(bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_DCINDET))
||
((bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_VBUSSEL) &&
(bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_VBUSDET))
) {
I can't parse it.
Maybe
bool dcinsel = bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_DCINSEL; bool dcindet = bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_DCINDET; bool vbussel = bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_VBUSSEL; bool vbusdet = bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_VBUSDET; bool dc = dcinsel && dcindet; bool vbus = vbussel && vbusdet;
if (dc || vbus) { ... } else if (dcindet || vbusdet) { ... } else { ... }
Note that it does not add a single line of code, but things become much more readable.
battery->charger_type = DA9052_CHARGER;
/* If charging end flag is set and Charging current is greater
* than charging end limit then battery is charging
*/
if ((chg_end & DA9052_STATUSB_CHGEND) != 0) {
ret = da9052_battery_read_current(battery,
&chg_current);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
ret = da9052_battery_read_end_current(battery,
&chg_end_current);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (chg_current >= chg_end_current)
battery->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
else
battery->status =
POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_NOT_CHARGING;
}
/* If Charging end flag is cleared then battery is charging */
else
battery->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
- } else if (bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_DCINDET ||
bat_status & DA9052_STATUSA_VBUSDET) {
battery->charger_type = DA9052_CHARGER;
battery->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_NOT_CHARGING;
- } else {
battery->charger_type = DA9052_NOCHARGER;
battery->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_DISCHARGING;
- }
- if (status != NULL)
*status = battery->status;
- return 0;
+}
[...]
+unsigned char select_temperature(unsigned char temp_index, int bat_temperature) +{
- int temp_temperature;
- temp_temperature = (temperature_lookup_ref[temp_index] +
temperature_lookup_ref[temp_index + 1]) / 2;
- if (bat_temperature >= temp_temperature) {
temp_index += 1;
return temp_index;
- } else
should be "} else {", per coding style.
return temp_index;
+}
+static int da9052_battery_read_capacity(struct da9052_battery *battery,
int *capacity)
+{
- int bat_temperature, bat_voltage;
- int vbat_lower, vbat_upper, level_upper, level_lower;
- int ret, flag, index, access_index = 0;
- ret = da9052_battery_read_volt(battery, &bat_voltage);
- if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- bat_temperature = da9052_adc_temperature_read(battery->da9052);
- if (bat_temperature < 0)
return bat_temperature;
- for (index = 0; index < (DA9052_NO_OF_LOOKUP_TABLE - 1); index++) {
if (bat_temperature <= temperature_lookup_ref[0]) {
access_index = 0;
break;
} else if (bat_temperature >
temperature_lookup_ref[DA9052_NO_OF_LOOKUP_TABLE]) {
access_index = DA9052_NO_OF_LOOKUP_TABLE - 1;
break;
} else if ((bat_temperature >= temperature_lookup_ref[index]) &&
(bat_temperature >= temperature_lookup_ref[index + 1]
)) {
Braces placement is weird. The longer identifiers you use, the less columns you have. Maybe try to use shorter variable names?
access_index = select_temperature(index,
bat_temperature);
break;
}
- }
- if (bat_voltage >= vbat_vs_capacity_look_up[access_index][0][0]) {
*capacity = 100;
return 0;
- }
- if (bat_voltage <= vbat_vs_capacity_look_up[access_index]
[DA9052_LOOK_UP_TABLE_SIZE - 1][0]) {
*capacity = 0;
return 0;
- }
- flag = 0;
- for (index = 0; index < (DA9052_LOOK_UP_TABLE_SIZE-1); index++) {
if ((bat_voltage <=
vbat_vs_capacity_look_up[access_index][index][0]) &&
(bat_voltage >=
vbat_vs_capacity_look_up[access_index][index + 1][0])) {
vbat_upper =
vbat_vs_capacity_look_up[access_index][index][0];
vbat_lower =
vbat_vs_capacity_look_up[access_index][index + 1][0];
level_upper =
vbat_vs_capacity_look_up[access_index][index][1];
level_lower =
vbat_vs_capacity_look_up[access_index][index + 1][1];
flag = 1;
break;
I can't parse it.
You don't have to use 24-character variable name to document your code. For example, you can rename vbat_vs_capacity_look_up to "vc_tbl" and just add a comment that the table is used to lookup voltage via capacity.
s/vbat_vs_capacity_look_up/vc_tbl/g s/access_index/i/g s/index/j/g
[...]
+static irqreturn_t da9052_bat_irq(int irq, void *data) +{
- struct da9052_battery *battery = (struct da9052_battery *)data;
Needless cast.
Thanks!