On 06/21/2011 03:09 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:23 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
[ ... ]
We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in order to get this done?
Hi Guilherme,
I have no problem to use powerdebug to validate this approach.
Did you asked to the mailman administrator [1] to add a powerdebug email alias for linaro-dev ?
I was thinking of having powerdebug@linaro.org as a regular mail account forwarding everything to linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; that wouldn't need to be done on mailman. Do you see any reason for doing it on mailman? Maybe powerdebug@lists.linaro.org would make more sense?
I can't create a powerdebug@linaro.org or powerdebug@lists.linaro.org mail address. We should ask to the mailman admin or IT what is the better approach.
I Cc'ed Amit which is the tech lead of the power management team.
Amit ?
we would like, Guilherme and I, to create a specific mail address for powerdebug so patchwork can correctly put the patches to the right project instead of "other-unknown".
We thought we can create a mailing list for powerdebug and subscribe only the linaro-dev mailing list. When we send the patches to powerdebug@linaro.org, cc'ing patches@linaro.org. The latter will determine to which project the patches belong to and at the same time the patches will fall into the linaro-dev mailing list.
If the result is what we expect with powerdebug, Guilherme would like to extend this approach to all linaro projects.
What do you think ?
Thanks -- Daniel