On 6 September 2011 17:28, Alexander Sack asac@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Fathi Boudra fathi.boudra@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 September 2011 08:28, Fathi Boudra fathi.boudra@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 September 2011 00:15, Alexander Sack asac@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Paul Sokolovsky paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:36:48 +0300 Paul Sokolovsky Paul.Sokolovsky@linaro.org wrote:
Ok, patched repo is available as:
http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=tools/repo.git%3Ba=blob_plain%3Bf=rep... that file should be downloaded and named as "repo". Apparently, it should be mirrored at download servers.
Right. where shall we put it? i think for AOSP you get it from an android.git.k.o URL. do we want to do something equivalent (e.g. android.git.l.o) or just put it on releases.linaro.org?
It should be treated as a released components: releases.l.o, update release wiki/website download links. If it could be provided as upstream does (on android.git.l.o), +1.
the patched version is available on:
http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/android/11.08/repo/repo-linaro-...
http://launchpad.net/linaro-android/11.11/11.08/+download/repo-linaro-1.7.5-...
and linked from: http://www.linaro.org/downloads/ http://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1108/Release#Android_Components
hmm. the AOSP repo can be wgetted without unpacking ...you basically just download the lightweight wrapper script instead of a tarball. IMO we should offer the same on top of the whole tarball as a component.
I don't see any difference between wget && chmod +x vs wget && bunzip2 I don't have a strong opinion on how AOSP does vs how Linaro components does.
Also this is not a 1108 component. it's 11.09 if anything.
Paul mentioned an 11.08 errata.