On 5 August 2013 10:45, Andy Green andy.green@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Mark -
I have some small practical questions about LSK. I was able to make a tree with our linux-linaro-core-tracking@v3.10 LT patches on LSK basis work well (so far).
I found this repo (it needs its ./description updating)
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-stable.git%3Ba=summary
- There seems to be two choices, linux-linaro-lsk and linux-linaro-lsk-android.
I chose the android one, I assume it has the same "androidization" series on top that linux-linaro-core-tracking used at 3.10? Are there any other differences?
- I saw the vexpress integration stuff from ARM LT was included
already which is good, is there a wiki page (or README.html or the gitweb is also good) explaining the composition?
- In our LT tree we patch mainline to remove all warnings coming with
our defconfig. Then if we see any warnings coming, we know it's our fault and we need to go fix it. Are you interested in taking a similar approach?
- Maybe this is too much thinking ahead, but shouldn't these lsk
branches be versioned, like linux-linaro-lsk-3.10? Otherwise when the next lsk version is announced there'll be a problem.
5) Gator bits don't seem to be in there, presumably that's something ARM would like to see in there (it appears in llct)
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0482a/BABEJAA... https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/working/arm/kernel.git%3Ba=sho...
-Andy
-Andy