10 Jul
2012
10 Jul
'12
8:29 a.m.
Hi Daniel,
On Friday 06 July 2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The main purpose of all these cleanup patches are to move out all non-data information from the cpuidle_state structure in order to add a new api which could be 'cpuidle_register_cpu_latency(int cpu, struct cpuidle_latencies latencies)'.
So are there any technical difficulties in adding such an api with the non-data information being part of cpuidle_state? Or its just that you think the already duplicated non-data information (per state) is going to be duplicated much more (per state per cpu) in most cases.
regards, Rajendra