30 Mar
2011
30 Mar
'11
12:04 a.m.
On 30 March 2011 01:45, Steve Langasek steve.langasek@linaro.org wrote:
I don't think this is a correct interpretation of the license. You don't have to change a package name to "plainly mark" the source as modified; debian/copyright, changelogs, notices in the source files accomplish this. This is done for packages all the time, not just for zlib.
from http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_license.html
2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be misrepresented as being the original software.
I read this then as "you cannot distribute it as a replacement of the original zlib library". I'll take your word that it's not the case, but it still is confusing to me.
Konstantinos