29 Sep
2011
29 Sep
'11
6:54 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
more thought. I also dropped Mark's change to append a device's name to a clk name since device tree might solve this neatly. Again more discussion around that would be good.
Some of that was for debugfs type stuff - if we end up providing information about the clocks via a diagnostic interface being able to distinguish between things in a textual fashion would be handy (and I'd guess the struct device may also be needed by any OF bindings to get at the bindings?).