We have a new channel on FreeNode for LAVA specific discussions:
#linaro-lava
This channel allows participants who are working with Linaro to join and just follow progress on LAVA.
We should be using the same guidelines for deciding whether something belongs on #linaro or not as channels like #linaro-android currently do.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Andy Doan andy.doan@linaro.org wrote:
We have a new channel on FreeNode for LAVA specific discussions:
#linaro-lava
This channel allows participants who are working with Linaro to join and just follow progress on LAVA.
We should be using the same guidelines for deciding whether something belongs on #linaro or not as channels like #linaro-android currently do.
Do we really need another extra channel?
I believe the current list is already too much, and the lava folks are the ones that are the most active at #linaro currently (which is good :-).
Seems that now we have the following IRC channels (could be even more): - #linaro - #linaro-lava - #linaro-android - #linaro-armhf - #linaro-kernel - #linaro-big.little - #linaro-multimedia
Which is a bit too much, at least for me.
On 05/10/2012 03:57 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Andy Doanandy.doan@linaro.org wrote:
We have a new channel on FreeNode for LAVA specific discussions:
#linaro-lava
snip
Do we really need another extra channel?
I believe the current list is already too much, and the lava folks are the ones that are the most active at #linaro currently (which is good :-).
Seems that now we have the following IRC channels (could be even more):
- #linaro
- #linaro-lava
- #linaro-android
- #linaro-armhf
- #linaro-kernel
- #linaro-big.little
- #linaro-multimedia
Which is a bit too much, at least for me.
I know everyone thinks "they're special", but in the case of #linaro-lava, I do think there's some value. We have some people who are interested in LAVA but not so much Linaro. So the signal-to-noise ratio on #linaro is a bit high. In my old role I would have complained about adding another channel. However, I've enjoyed the split the past 2 days.
That said, I think the users of #linaro-lava need to be proactive about moving conversations to #linaro when appropriate.
-andy
We need an irc aggregator to flatten all the channels to one on rx and broadcast on tx for those of use who want to live in a flat world (only half kidding:)
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Andy Doan andy.doan@linaro.org wrote:
On 05/10/2012 03:57 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Andy Doanandy.doan@linaro.org wrote:
We have a new channel on FreeNode for LAVA specific discussions:
#linaro-lava
snip
Do we really need another extra channel?
I believe the current list is already too much, and the lava folks are the ones that are the most active at #linaro currently (which is good :-).
Seems that now we have the following IRC channels (could be even more):
- #linaro
- #linaro-lava
- #linaro-android
- #linaro-armhf
- #linaro-kernel
- #linaro-big.little
- #linaro-multimedia
Which is a bit too much, at least for me.
I know everyone thinks "they're special", but in the case of #linaro-lava, I do think there's some value. We have some people who are interested in LAVA but not so much Linaro. So the signal-to-noise ratio on #linaro is a bit high. In my old role I would have complained about adding another channel. However, I've enjoyed the split the past 2 days.
That said, I think the users of #linaro-lava need to be proactive about moving conversations to #linaro when appropriate.
-andy
______________________________**_________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/**mailman/listinfo/linaro-devhttp://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 10 May 2012 17:34, John Rigby john.rigby@linaro.org wrote:
We need an irc aggregator to flatten all the channels to one on rx and broadcast on tx for those of use who want to live in a flat world (only half kidding:)
Quassel has a chat monitor view that gives you exactly that if you want it...
Example blob (formatting is better in-client):
[11:05:06] Freenode:#ubuntu:airdem typing "locale" in terminal gives ma different output than .pam_environment [11:05:17] Freenode:#ubuntu:airdem where is that info from? [11:05:31] Freenode:#linaro:zyga actually, the host at that location is using a 10K 34G disk [11:05:37] Freenode:#linaro:suihkulokki and nothing else using the sd image file or other io going on ? [11:05:43] Freenode:#linaro:zyga it's pretty old, well over 5 years now [11:05:49] Freenode:#linaro:zyga nope [11:05:53] Freenode:#linaro:zyga I usually hear that disk :) [11:05:57] Freenode:#ubuntu:azrip i just reboot my server, just like that i would like to know how many days my server run before [11:06:03] Freenode:#linaro:zyga everything is idle [11:06:03] Freenode:#ubuntu:azrip how to check that ? [11:06:30] Freenode:#ubuntu:myrmidette|n1 can anyone post their /etc/host* files? I accidentally deleted mine [11:07:06] Freenode:#ubuntu:ionwind i try the before [11:07:08] Freenode:#ubuntu:no_gravity myrmidette|n1: an empty hosts file could work.
W dniu 10.05.2012 09:34, John Rigby pisze:
We need an irc aggregator to flatten all the channels to one on rx and broadcast on tx for those of use who want to live in a flat world (only half kidding:)
You mean ircII/epic when by default all was in one window and Ctrl-x was used to switch channels before saying anything?
-
Andy Doan -
James Tunnicliffe -
John Rigby -
Marcin Juszkiewicz -
Ricardo Salveti