Hi
There is another ICE which is happening when compiling libcstdc++ for x86 Attached testcase you will be able to reproduce this problem by compiling
cc1plus a.i -Os -march=pentiumpro
and if I revert r99456 this works well.
Hope that helps
-Khem
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Khem Raj raj.khem@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
There is another ICE which is happening when compiling libcstdc++ for x86 Attached testcase you will be able to reproduce this problem by compiling
cc1plus a.i -Os -march=pentiumpro
and if I revert r99456 this works well.
Hi Khem. Sorry for the delay in replying but we've all been busy with the mid-cycle sprint.
I can't reproduce this with the latest gcc-linaro-2011.01-1 release. Would you mind trying again with that revision?
-- Michael
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Khem Raj raj.khem@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
There is another ICE which is happening when compiling libcstdc++ for x86 Attached testcase you will be able to reproduce this problem by compiling
cc1plus a.i -Os -march=pentiumpro
and if I revert r99456 this works well.
Hi Khem. Sorry for the delay in replying but we've all been busy with the mid-cycle sprint.
I can't reproduce this with the latest gcc-linaro-2011.01-1 release. Would you mind trying again with that revision?
Probably because r99461 backs out the faulty commit.
-- Michael
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Khem Raj raj.khem@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Khem Raj raj.khem@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
There is another ICE which is happening when compiling libcstdc++ for x86 Attached testcase you will be able to reproduce this problem by compiling
cc1plus a.i -Os -march=pentiumpro
and if I revert r99456 this works well.
Hi Khem. Sorry for the delay in replying but we've all been busy with the mid-cycle sprint.
I can't reproduce this with the latest gcc-linaro-2011.01-1 release. Would you mind trying again with that revision?
Probably because r99461 backs out the faulty commit.
OK. We'll keep an eye on it when the updated version of this patch lands.
-- Michael