From: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com
If there is only 1 function registered, and IRQ:s are supported and currently enabled, call the callback handler directly without checking the CCCR registers.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.forlin@linaro.org --- drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c index b300161..25291bf 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c @@ -32,6 +32,20 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card) int i, ret, count; unsigned char pending;
+ /* + * If there is only 1 function registered + * call irq directly without checking the CCCR registers. + */ + if ((card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) && + card->host->sdio_irqs && (card->sdio_funcs == 1)) + for (i = 0; i < SDIO_MAX_FUNCS; i++) { + struct sdio_func *func = card->sdio_func[i]; + if (func && func->irq_handler) { + func->irq_handler(func); + return 1; + } + } + ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_INTx, 0, &pending); if (ret) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: error %d reading SDIO_CCCR_INTx\n",
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
From: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com
If there is only 1 function registered, and IRQ:s are supported and currently enabled, call the callback handler directly without checking the CCCR registers.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.forlin@linaro.org
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c index b300161..25291bf 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c @@ -32,6 +32,20 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card) int i, ret, count; unsigned char pending;
- /*
* If there is only 1 function registered
* call irq directly without checking the CCCR registers.
*/
- if ((card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) &&
card->host->sdio_irqs && (card->sdio_funcs == 1))
for (i = 0; i < SDIO_MAX_FUNCS; i++) {
struct sdio_func *func = card->sdio_func[i];
if (func && func->irq_handler) {
func->irq_handler(func);
return 1;
}
}
- ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_INTx, 0, &pending); if (ret) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: error %d reading SDIO_CCCR_INTx\n",
-- 1.7.4.1
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 4 May 2011 05:40, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
From: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com
If there is only 1 function registered, and IRQ:s are supported and currently enabled, call the callback handler directly without checking the CCCR registers.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.forlin@linaro.org
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
I am working o a patch version 2 after offline discussion with Ulf Hansson. Instead of adding this code here. Add sdio_single_func member in mmc_card. Set and reset this function in sdio_claim_irq and sdio_release_irq. process_sdio_pending_irqs would only check if sdio_single_func is != null and call it.
This will result in a bigger patch overall but the new code in process_sdio_pending_irqs will be minimal.
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c index b300161..25291bf 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c @@ -32,6 +32,20 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card) int i, ret, count; unsigned char pending;
- /*
- * If there is only 1 function registered
- * call irq directly without checking the CCCR registers.
- */
- if ((card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) &&
- card->host->sdio_irqs && (card->sdio_funcs == 1))
- for (i = 0; i < SDIO_MAX_FUNCS; i++) {
Minor adjustments. card->sdio_funcs may be > 1 but still only one irq is registered. No need to iterate more than "sdio_funcs" number of elements. + card->host->sdio_irqs == 1) + for (i = 0; i < card->sdio_funcs; i++) {
- struct sdio_func *func = card->sdio_func[i];
- if (func && func->irq_handler) {
- func->irq_handler(func);
- return 1;
- }
- }
ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_INTx, 0, &pending); if (ret) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: error %d reading SDIO_CCCR_INTx\n", -- 1.7.4.1
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
On 4 May 2011 05:40, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
From: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com
If there is only 1 function registered, and IRQ:s are supported and currently enabled, call the callback handler directly without checking the CCCR registers.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.forlin@linaro.org
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
I am working o a patch version 2 after offline discussion with Ulf Hansson. Instead of adding this code here. Add sdio_single_func member in mmc_card. Set and reset this function in sdio_claim_irq and sdio_release_irq. process_sdio_pending_irqs would only check if sdio_single_func is != null and call it.
Yes, that's what I was about to propose after thinking about it some more.
This will result in a bigger patch overall but the new code in process_sdio_pending_irqs will be minimal.
Something like this (untested) ?
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c index b300161..4552727 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card) int i, ret, count; unsigned char pending;
+ if (card->sdio_single_irq) { + struct sdio_func *func = card->sdio_single_irq; + func->irq_handler(func); + return 1; + } + ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_INTx, 0, &pending); if (ret) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: error %d reading SDIO_CCCR_INTx\n", @@ -166,6 +172,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card) host->sdio_irqs--; return err; } + return 1; }
return 0; @@ -183,7 +190,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card) kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread); }
- return 0; + return (host->sdio_irqs == 1); }
/** @@ -225,8 +232,12 @@ int sdio_claim_irq(struct sdio_func *func, sdio_irq_handler_t *handler)
func->irq_handler = handler; ret = sdio_card_irq_get(func->card); - if (ret) + if (ret < 0) { func->irq_handler = NULL; + } else if (ret == 1) { + card->sdio_single_irq = func; + ret = 0; + }
return ret; } @@ -250,7 +261,17 @@ int sdio_release_irq(struct sdio_func *func)
if (func->irq_handler) { func->irq_handler = NULL; - sdio_card_irq_put(func->card); + if (sdio_card_irq_put(func->card) == 1) { + int i; + for (i = 0, i < 7; i++) { + if (func->card->sdio_func[i].irq_handler) { + func->card->sdio_single_irq = + func->card->sdio_func[i]; + break; + } + } + } else + func->card->sdio_single_irq = NULL; }
ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(func->card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_IENx, 0, ®); diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h index adb4888..fee3df3 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ struct mmc_card { struct sdio_cccr cccr; /* common card info */ struct sdio_cis cis; /* common tuple info */ struct sdio_func *sdio_func[SDIO_MAX_FUNCS]; /* SDIO functions (devices) */ + struct sdio_func *sdio_single_irq; /* SDIO function when only one IRQ active */ unsigned num_info; /* number of info strings */ const char **info; /* info strings */ struct sdio_func_tuple *tuples; /* unknown common tuples */
Nicolas
On 4 May 2011 17:20, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
On 4 May 2011 05:40, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
From: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com
If there is only 1 function registered, and IRQ:s are supported and currently enabled, call the callback handler directly without checking the CCCR registers.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.forlin@linaro.org
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
I am working o a patch version 2 after offline discussion with Ulf Hansson. Instead of adding this code here. Add sdio_single_func member in mmc_card. Set and reset this function in sdio_claim_irq and sdio_release_irq. process_sdio_pending_irqs would only check if sdio_single_func is != null and call it.
Yes, that's what I was about to propose after thinking about it some more.
This will result in a bigger patch overall but the new code in process_sdio_pending_irqs will be minimal.
Something like this (untested) ?
What I had in mind is similar. Please let me know what you think. I am about to post "patch v2"
Regards, Per