On 14/09/2020 14:48, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:40:20PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Define the meanings of "MUST" and similar language for clarity.
Fixes: #46 Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Looks like Grant and I both thought "let's just fix this one before the meeting"!
You can ignore this (unless you want to copy the specific sphinx syntax for citing RFCs).
:-D :-D
I'll pick up the sphinx syntax. Thanks!
g.
Daniel.
source/chapter1-about.rst | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/source/chapter1-about.rst b/source/chapter1-about.rst index 3744d8a14086..3b5339a9c202 100644 --- a/source/chapter1-about.rst +++ b/source/chapter1-about.rst @@ -171,6 +171,10 @@ UEFI ยง 6.1 - Reference to the UEFI specification [UEFI]_ section 6.1 Terms and abbreviations =======================
+The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", +SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this +document are to be interpreted as described in :rfc:`2119`.
This document uses the following terms and abbreviations.
.. glossary::
-- 2.25.4
boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.