details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6 Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
Agenda for today: - EBBR v1.0 released (yay!) - goals for v1.1 or v2.0 - other issues - secure world interfaces - non-block storage - identification of protected blocks - other business
--- Grant Likely Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
________________________________ From: Grant Likely Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM To: Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka Subject: Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6 Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
Hi Grant
- other business
See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of UEFI-SCT is enough ? Regards Udit
From: arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com On Behalf Of Grant Likely Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM To: Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu tonywu@realtek.com; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
Agenda for today: - EBBR v1.0 released (yay!) - goals for v1.1 or v2.0 - other issues - secure world interfaces - non-block storage - identification of protected blocks - other business --- Grant Likely Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
________________________________ From: Grant Likely Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM To: Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka Subject: Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6 Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren't here. I'm not going to have a dial in, but I'll take good notes.
g.
Hi Udit,
We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing.
Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm.
g.
On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
- other business
See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of UEFI-SCT is enough ?
Regards
Udit
*From:* arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM *To:* Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu tonywu@realtek.com; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
Agenda for today:
EBBR v1.0 released (yay!)
goals for v1.1 or v2.0
other issues
- secure world interfaces
- non-block storage
- identification of protected blocks
- other business
Grant Likely
Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
*From:*Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6
Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:42:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Udit,
We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing.
Just FYI, it was last July that I ran UEFI SCT with U-Boot on qemu. Here is a summary of the result: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17e45yojM2nLdRovx0gcgHIAmvv9b_yc9iIUj... (Please note that this is not for public review, but just informative.)
In my experience, I saw lots of failure cases (some or most of them are trivial and can be duplicated ones though), and running through all the test cases took a whole week. This is partly because SCT crashes occasionally and I needed to restart it next morning :)
So I'm not sure that U-Boot UEFI is ready for automated testing with SCT. (We made lots of improvements recently, but I have had no time to re-run SCT these days. Give me a fast machine :)
-Takahiro Akashi
Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm.
g.
On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
- other business
See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of UEFI-SCT is enough ?
Regards
Udit
*From:* arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM *To:* Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu tonywu@realtek.com; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
Agenda for today:
EBBR v1.0 released (yay!)
goals for v1.1 or v2.0
other issues
- secure world interfaces
- non-block storage
- identification of protected blocks
- other business
Grant Likely
Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
*From:*Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6
Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.
boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
Hi,
how do you run it? Any log? How much time does it take to run one test? Is there any test which exceed 20s?
Thanks, Michal
On 09. 04. 19 7:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:42:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Udit,
We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing.
Just FYI, it was last July that I ran UEFI SCT with U-Boot on qemu. Here is a summary of the result: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17e45yojM2nLdRovx0gcgHIAmvv9b_yc9iIUj... (Please note that this is not for public review, but just informative.)
In my experience, I saw lots of failure cases (some or most of them are trivial and can be duplicated ones though), and running through all the test cases took a whole week. This is partly because SCT crashes occasionally and I needed to restart it next morning :)
So I'm not sure that U-Boot UEFI is ready for automated testing with SCT. (We made lots of improvements recently, but I have had no time to re-run SCT these days. Give me a fast machine :)
-Takahiro Akashi
Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm.
g.
On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
- other business
See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of UEFI-SCT is enough ?
Regards
Udit
*From:* arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM *To:* Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu tonywu@realtek.com; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
Agenda for today:
EBBR v1.0 released (yay!)
goals for v1.1 or v2.0
other issues
- secure world interfaces
- non-block storage
- identification of protected blocks
- other business
Grant Likely
Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
*From:*Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6
Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.
boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
Arm.ebbr-discuss mailing list Arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 08:16:40AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
how do you run it?
Just run EDK2's Shell.efi and then kick off SCT from the shell.
Any log?
If you are interested, see: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z-gvW2UC4J2dzvwMLacOyNjqcbiSyHEO/view?usp=s...
But digging into it is not a good idea. We'd better get fresh run of SCT with the latest U-Boot.
How much time does it take to run one test? Is there any test which exceed 20s?
Sorry, I have no statistics.
-Takahiro Akashi
Thanks, Michal
On 09. 04. 19 7:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:42:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Udit,
We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing.
Just FYI, it was last July that I ran UEFI SCT with U-Boot on qemu. Here is a summary of the result: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17e45yojM2nLdRovx0gcgHIAmvv9b_yc9iIUj... (Please note that this is not for public review, but just informative.)
In my experience, I saw lots of failure cases (some or most of them are trivial and can be duplicated ones though), and running through all the test cases took a whole week. This is partly because SCT crashes occasionally and I needed to restart it next morning :)
So I'm not sure that U-Boot UEFI is ready for automated testing with SCT. (We made lots of improvements recently, but I have had no time to re-run SCT these days. Give me a fast machine :)
-Takahiro Akashi
Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm.
g.
On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
- other business
See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of UEFI-SCT is enough ?
Regards
Udit
*From:* arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM *To:* Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu tonywu@realtek.com; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
Agenda for today:
EBBR v1.0 released (yay!)
goals for v1.1 or v2.0
other issues
- secure world interfaces
- non-block storage
- identification of protected blocks
- other business
Grant Likely
Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
*From:*Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6
Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.
boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
Arm.ebbr-discuss mailing list Arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com
Hi,
Just asking because you can integrate it to u-boot python testing framework. http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git%3Ba=tree%3Bf=test/py/tests
Take a look at test_efi* files. Maybe you can integrate it there.
Thanks, Michal
On 09. 04. 19 9:59, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 08:16:40AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
how do you run it?
Just run EDK2's Shell.efi and then kick off SCT from the shell.
Any log?
If you are interested, see: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z-gvW2UC4J2dzvwMLacOyNjqcbiSyHEO/view?usp=s...
But digging into it is not a good idea. We'd better get fresh run of SCT with the latest U-Boot.
How much time does it take to run one test? Is there any test which exceed 20s?
Sorry, I have no statistics.
-Takahiro Akashi
Thanks, Michal
On 09. 04. 19 7:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:42:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Udit,
We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing.
Just FYI, it was last July that I ran UEFI SCT with U-Boot on qemu. Here is a summary of the result: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17e45yojM2nLdRovx0gcgHIAmvv9b_yc9iIUj... (Please note that this is not for public review, but just informative.)
In my experience, I saw lots of failure cases (some or most of them are trivial and can be duplicated ones though), and running through all the test cases took a whole week. This is partly because SCT crashes occasionally and I needed to restart it next morning :)
So I'm not sure that U-Boot UEFI is ready for automated testing with SCT. (We made lots of improvements recently, but I have had no time to re-run SCT these days. Give me a fast machine :)
-Takahiro Akashi
Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm.
g.
On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
> - other business
See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of UEFI-SCT is enough ?
Regards
Udit
*From:* arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM *To:* Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu tonywu@realtek.com; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
Agenda for today:
EBBR v1.0 released (yay!)
goals for v1.1 or v2.0
other issues
- secure world interfaces
- non-block storage
- identification of protected blocks
- other business
Grant Likely
Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
*From:*Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6
Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.
boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
Arm.ebbr-discuss mailing list Arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com
Thanks for information AKASHI
IMO for EBBR, we need to define subset of test-cases, which are required in EBBR specs. I expect some fail in u-boot. Also need to find a better way to build uefi-sct
Regards Udit
-----Original Message----- From: AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.akashi@linaro.org Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 10:53 AM To: Grant Likely Grant.Likely@arm.com Cc: Udit Kumar udit.kumar@nxp.com; Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu tonywu@realtek.com; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr- discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com; nd nd@arm.com Subject: [EXT] Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:42:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Udit,
We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing.
Just FYI, it was last July that I ran UEFI SCT with U-Boot on qemu. Here is a summary of the result: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.goo gle.com%2Fspreadsheets%2Fd%2F17e45yojM2nLdRovx0gcgHIAmvv9b_yc9iIUjZ 2LY22c%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Cudit.kumar%40nxp. com%7Cc5b24ae4bd26466e1a7008d6bcab1c5c%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99 c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636903840436702643&sdata=00NOqcpsKPi8DkJ u8y%2F7mLqSI8qQGFSGqzBhbpo3bbE%3D&reserved=0 (Please note that this is not for public review, but just informative.)
In my experience, I saw lots of failure cases (some or most of them are trivial and can be duplicated ones though), and running through all the test cases took a whole week. This is partly because SCT crashes occasionally and I needed to restart it next morning :)
So I'm not sure that U-Boot UEFI is ready for automated testing with SCT. (We made lots of improvements recently, but I have had no time to re-run SCT these days. Give me a fast machine :)
-Takahiro Akashi
Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm.
g.
On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
- other business
See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of UEFI-SCT is enough ?
Regards
Udit
*From:* arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM *To:* Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
Agenda for today:
EBBR v1.0 released (yay!)
goals for v1.1 or v2.0
other issues
secure world interfaces
non-block storage
identification of protected blocks
other business
Grant Likely
Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
*From:*Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6
Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.
boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist s.linaro.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fboot-
architecture&data=02%7C01
%7Cudit.kumar%40nxp.com%7Cc5b24ae4bd26466e1a7008d6bcab1c5c%7C686 ea1d3b
c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636903840436702643&sdata=F Rd8%2B
nzRF827ZMG1fYeDwEr90V%2BZHvIHbFiIPAhBFiQ%3D&reserved=0
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
-
AKASHI Takahiro -
Grant Likely -
Michal Simek -
Udit Kumar