Hi Udit,
We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing.
Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm.
g.
On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
- other business
See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of UEFI-SCT is enough ?
Regards
Udit
*From:* arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com arm.ebbr-discuss-bounces@arm.com *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM *To:* Dong Wei Dong.Wei@arm.com; Eric FINCO eric.finco@st.com; Robert Oshana robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu tonywu@realtek.com; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com; LEDGE SC ledge-sc@linaro.org; Varis, Pekka p-varis@ti.com *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
Agenda for today:
EBBR v1.0 released (yay!)
goals for v1.1 or v2.0
other issues
- secure world interfaces
- non-block storage
- identification of protected blocks
- other business
Grant Likely
Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering
*From:*Grant Likely *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; robert.oshana@nxp.com; Tony Wu; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect
details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite:
Room: Lotus 5-6
Time: 5:00pm
Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, but I’ll take good notes.
g.