linaro-dev June 2012

linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

85 participants
81 discussions

by YongQin Liu

Hi, Saugata We have a problem to use the mmcblk0p8 partition, do you know if we can use it, and how can we use it? I created the 8th partition with fdisk command and the 8th partition is listed in the output of fdisk -l command but it is not listed in /proc/partitions file, even after reboot And also I can't use mkfs.vfat -n sdcard /dev/mmcblk0p8 to format. Could you give me some help about this? Thanks, Yongqin Liu

11 years, 5 months

Virtual Keyboard Issue

by Bharathi Subramanian

Hi All, I am using Linaro 11.11 Gingerbread with 10" LCD and touchscreen. In that, the Android Virtual Keyboard is not visible fully on the screen. So unable to type Text in SMS or URL in Browser. Only 5mm of the keyboard's top portion alone is visible. Any clue on how to fix this issue? Is it related to IDC file? Regards, -- Bharathi Subramanian

11 years, 5 months

Thank you Chengjie

by Zach Pfeffer

Hey all, Today is Chengjie's last day as a Linaro assignee. I'd like to thank him for his great work on the Linaro Android team over the last 6 months. He has had a big hand in supporting Origen and improving test automation. Chengjie is still keen on helping Linaro. He will transition to a community member, where he'll be able to help out (without being required to file status :). Its been great to have you on the team Chengjie, thanks! -- Zach Pfeffer Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

11 years, 5 months

Merge tmp.perf/core branch

by Dmitry Antipov

Andrey, can we merge it into official Linaro tree(s)? This is going to mainline anyway, but there are some requests to get perf updates faster than Ingo can accept them. Dmitry -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [RFC] tmp.perf/core branch with event_name changes and some more Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:05:13 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme(a)ghostprotocols.net> To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung(a)gmail.com>, David Ahern <dsahern(a)gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa(a)redhat.com>, Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov(a)linaro.org> Hi guys, Could you please check out if my tmp.perf/core branch fixes the problems reported lately about event name mismatches from perf.data files collected in other machines, etc. Jiri, I made changes to how parse-events cache evsel->name, please check the cset logs to see if all is well, perf test passes at least. Namhyung, this branch also has some of your patches, please check that it is ok. Since more people are cloning from my tree, I'm trying to get used to not rebasing them, thus this tmp.perf/core attempt this time :-\ To test it, just add my remote on your local linux git repo: $ cd git/linux # or whichever name you chose $ git remote add acme git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux $ git remote update acme $ git checkout -b tmp.perf/core acme/tmp.perf/core and build the tool. Best Regards, - Arnaldo

11 years, 5 months

[PATCH] Modify for Android build system.

by kejun.zhou

From: "kejun.zhou" <dp583(a)stebjsxu0119.(none)> Signed-off-by: kejun.zhou <kejun.zhou(a)linaro.org> --- Android.mk | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/Android.mk b/Android.mk index 5053e7d..b296974 100644 --- a/Android.mk +++ b/Android.mk @@ -1 +1,22 @@ include $(call all-subdir-makefiles) + +include $(CLEAR_VARS) +CPUFREQ := cpufreq_01.sh cpufreq_02.sh cpufreq_03.sh cpufreq_04.sh cpufreq_05.sh cpufreq_06.sh cpufreq_07.sh cpufreq_08.sh cpufreq_09.sh + +CPUHOTPLUG := cpuhotplug_01.sh cpuhotplug_02.sh cpuhotplug_03.sh cpuhotplug_04.sh cpuhotplug_05.sh cpuhotplug_06.sh cpuhotplug_07.sh cpuhotplug_08.sh 1_sanity_check.sh z_sanity_check.sh + +CPUIDLE := cpuidle_01.sh cpuidle_02.sh cpuidle_03.sh cpuidle_killer + +INCLUDE := functions.sh suspend.sh thermal_functions.sh + +SCHED_MC := sched_01.sh sched_02.sh sched_03.sh sched_04.sh + +SUSPEND := suspend_01.sh suspend_02.sh suspend_03.sh suspend_04.sh suspend_05.sh suspend_06.sh + +THERMAL := thermal_01.sh thermal_02.sh thermal_03.sh thermal_04.sh thermal_05.sh thermal_06.sh + +UTILS := cpuburn cpucycle heat_cpu nanosleep + +systemtarball: $(CPUFREQ) $(CPUHOTPLUG) $(CPUIDLE) $(INCLUDE) $(SCHED_MC) $(SUSPEND) $(THERMAL) $(UTILS) + + -- 1.7.10

11 years, 5 months

What happened on KVM in Q1.12

by Michael Hope

Thought I'd send out an email on what progress was made on KVM last quarter. The Linaro platform and toolchain groups did quite a bit of integration work to package and polish the different components to make it quicker to get going on KVM. You can now download pre-built versions of the boot wrapper, QEMU, kernel, and root file system; use linaro-image tools to create a host and guest; and then spin both up inside a Fast Model. There's more information including versions used and links off at: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Outputs/KVMIntegration There's still much to be done. The current focus is helping the upstream developers (Hi Christoffer!) get the patch set up into kvm-next. -- Michael

11 years, 5 months

PATCH: Initial Power and Voltage domain support for powerdebug

by eric van tassell

subject line corrected as advised. Thanks. -evt ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: eric van tassell <evttxl(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:35 PM Subject: RFC: Initial Power and Voltage domain support for powerdebug To: linaro-dev(a)lists.linaro.org + all written in usermode + no new proc files + configuration based on text file so easy to adapt to the non-omap proletarians + gui alignment still needs work + sample config files for PD and VDD in the patch but lots of registers and domains still need to be added + same code does power and voltage domains + diff attached + screenshots attached -- - evt (Eric van Tassell) twitter: evt_texelsoft linked-in: linkedin.com/in/evttxl -- - evt (Eric van Tassell) twitter: evt_texelsoft linked-in: linkedin.com/in/evttxl

11 years, 5 months

[PATCH] When building a XIP kernel, use physical memory as scratch space instead since we're probably running of a read-only medium.

by Wallace Wadge

Signed-off-by: Wallace Wadge <wwadge(a)gmail.com> --- arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S index f1c8486..50b4f03 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S @@ -170,7 +170,11 @@ __v7_ca15mp_setup: mcreq p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1 #endif __v7_setup: +#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL + ldr r12, =CONFIG_PHYS_OFFSET @ the local stack, use physical memory here. +#else adr r12, __v7_setup_stack @ the local stack +#endif stmia r12, {r0-r5, r7, r9, r11, lr} bl v7_flush_dcache_all ldmia r12, {r0-r5, r7, r9, r11, lr} -- 1.7.8.3

11 years, 5 months

Re: [RFC] tmp.perf/core branch with event_name changes and some more

by Dmitry Antipov

On 06/12/2012 09:05 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Could you please check out if my tmp.perf/core branch fixes the > problems reported lately about event name mismatches from perf.data > files collected in other machines, etc. As of a8dfce8b37b2e0d216860191cd50fde501eeb036, perf sched replay doesn't work because (perf_evlist__set_tracepoints_handlers): ... err = trace_event__id(assocs[i].name); <-- err is host id, not from perf.data if (err < 0) goto out; evsel = perf_evlist__find_tracepoint_by_id(evlist, err); <-- oops! ... Assuming event names are set, can we just lookup by name? Dmitry

11 years, 5 months

Linaro Release 12.05 Postmortem Summary

by David Zinman

Regretfully this summary is very late. The Linaro 12.05 delivery cycle was fast and furious with Connect Q2.12, end of quarter and delivery all occurring in the same week. During this 2012.05 Linaro Connect, much of the effort was focused on: * ARM big.LITTLE implementation and testing * Performance improvements * Linaro-linux baseline * Release process streamlining Delivery highlights can be seen at http://www.linaro.org/downloads/1205#tab1 Platform Blueprints ---------------------------- The number of blueprints that missed the cycle: Android 18 out of 30 Developer Platform 6 out of 18 Infrastructure 5 out of 10 Lava 5 out of 18 Total: 34 out of 76 45% of blueprints scheduled for this cycle were not delivered. * Not included is data from working groups and landing teams Source: https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjEaTwrvj1bidDBIM… Roadmap End Of Quarter ------------------------------------- Android - 5 Cards, 5 Delivered Dev Platform - 5 Cards, 3 Delivered Graphics WG - 3 Cards, 3 Delivered Kernel WG - 4 Cards, 3 Delivered LAVA - 3 Cards, 2 Delivered Multimedia WG - 3 Cards, 1 Delivered OCTO - 2 Cards, 2 Delivered Power Management WG - 5 Cards, 5 Delivered Total 29 Cards, 24 delivered or probably delivered. Source: https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmTRRvye9pnjdGJaV… -- David Zinman Linaro Release Manager | Project Manager Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs

11 years, 5 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-dev June 2012