linaro-dev

linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

4332 discussions

[PATCH PM-QA] thermal/thermal_06.sh: add missing get_os before check the return value

by Li Zhijian

Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian(a)cn.fujitsu.com> --- thermal/thermal_06.sh | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/thermal/thermal_06.sh b/thermal/thermal_06.sh index d8bcd23..6fdc469 100755 --- a/thermal/thermal_06.sh +++ b/thermal/thermal_06.sh @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ check_trip_point_change() { trip_type=0 trip_type_path=0 $CPU_HEAT_BIN & + get_os if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then cpu_pid=$(ps | grep heat_cpu| awk '{print $1}') else -- 2.15.0.rc0

7 years, 2 months

Upgrading Gerrit Servers

by Ben Copeland

Hello All, On 8th October (08/10/2017) two of our Gerrit servers will be upgraded for essential maintenance. The server will be offline from 10:00 - 14:00 UTC. Servers that will be affected: review.linaro.org / git-us.linaro.org android-git-us.linaro.org / android-review.linaro.org Regards Ben

7 years, 2 months

Second Ubuntu Artful Aardvark test rebuild

by Matthias Klose

The second test rebuild of Artful Aardvark was started on September 22 for all architectures, all components (main component and seeded packages finished, unseeded packages still building). For arm64 and armhf the gcc-6 and gcc-7 packages are based on the Linaro 6-2017.09 snapshots. Results (please also look at the superseded builds) can be found at http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/rebuilds/test-rebuild-20170922-artful.html The test rebuild uses the release pocket only, without packages from the proposed pocket. Additional build failures for packages in artful-proposed (not yet in artful) can be found at http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ Please help fixing the build failures. Information about transitioning to GCC 7 can be found at: * https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/porting_to.html * https://wiki.debian.org/GCC7 * Please forward patches for GCC 7 build failures to the bug reports already filed in Debian (see the above wiki page for the bug list). Matthias

7 years, 3 months

[PM-QA] question about thermal

by Xiang Dai

Hi! I test with below two cpu to test: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz With below action: make -C cpuidle cpuidle_killer make -C thermal run_tests It shows several thermal zone and cooling device on my machine. But there will be following err in the test suite. And need your help 1. in thermal_01: There is not 'mode' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0'. Is this caused by hw or drives? Or may I change kernel config to meet it? 2. in thermal_03 and thermal_06: It will says glmark2 not found... It seems my machine doesn't have some devices or features. I want to know which kind of machine could meet the need. 3. in thermal_04: there will be err when checking colling devices with "effective cool=-1000". It looks like an illegal value passed in. If it could be OK on some other machine. It should be caused by some feature of my machine. Could we abandon some case by pass some parameter in? 4. in thermal_05: can't find cpufreq in colling devices. Could this fixed by some operation on kernel? the log shows below. Thanks for your help. ``` make: Entering directory '/lkp/benchmarks/pm-qa/thermal' ### ### thermal_00: ### list existing thermal-zones and cooling-devices in the system ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#therma… ### Thermal Zone list ----------------- thermal_zone0 - x86_pkg_temp thermal_zone1 - x86_pkg_temp Cooling Device list ------------------- cooling_device0 - Processor cooling_device1 - Processor cooling_device10 - Processor cooling_device11 - Processor ... ### ### thermal_01: ### test/verify the thermal zone files are present in the sysfs and check the validity of the mode field, bindings and trip temperatures ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### thermal_01.0: checking 'mode' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0'... Err thermal_01.0: checking 'mode' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1'... Err thermal_01.0: checking thermal_zone0 cur_mode=... Err thermal_01.0: checking thermal_zone1 cur_mode=... Err thermal_01.1: checking 'trip_point_0_temp' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0'... Ok thermal_01.2: checking 'trip_point_0_type' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0'... Ok thermal_01.3: checking 'thermal_zone0'/'trip_point_0_temp' ='0'... Err thermal_01.4: checking 'trip_point_1_temp' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0'... Ok thermal_01.5: checking 'trip_point_1_type' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0'... Ok thermal_01.6: checking 'thermal_zone0'/'trip_point_1_temp' ='0'... Err thermal_01.7: checking 'trip_point_0_temp' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1'... Ok thermal_01.8: checking 'trip_point_0_type' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1'... Ok thermal_01.9: checking 'thermal_zone1'/'trip_point_0_temp' ='0'... Err thermal_01.10: checking 'trip_point_1_temp' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1'... Ok thermal_01.11: checking 'trip_point_1_type' exists in '/sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1'... Ok checking thermal_01.12: checking 'thermal_zone1'/'trip_point_1_temp' ='0'... Err ... thermal_02: pass ### ### thermal_03: ### test/verify that temperature is increasing/decreasing as the load is increased/decreased ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### thermal_03.0: glmark2 not found... skip thermal_03: skip ### ### thermal_04: ### test/verify the cooling device are lowering the temperature down ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### thermal_04.0: checking cooling_device0:state=1 effective cool=-2000 ... Err thermal_04.1: checking cooling_device0:state=2 effective cool=1000 ... Ok thermal_04.2: checking cooling_device0:state=3 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.3: checking cooling_device0:state=4 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.4: checking cooling_device0:state=5 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.5: checking cooling_device0:state=6 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.6: checking cooling_device0:state=7 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.7: checking cooling_device0:state=8 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.8: checking cooling_device0:state=9 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.9: checking cooling_device0:state=10 effective cool=5000 ... Ok thermal_04.0: checking cooling_device1:state=1 effective cool=-1000 ... Err thermal_04.1: checking cooling_device1:state=2 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.2: checking cooling_device1:state=3 effective cool=5000 ... Ok thermal_04.3: checking cooling_device1:state=4 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.4: checking cooling_device1:state=5 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.5: checking cooling_device1:state=6 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.6: checking cooling_device1:state=7 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.7: checking cooling_device1:state=8 effective cool=5000 ... Ok thermal_04.8: checking cooling_device1:state=9 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.9: checking cooling_device1:state=10 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.0: checking cooling_device10:state=1 effective cool=-2000 ... Err thermal_04.1: checking cooling_device10:state=2 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.2: checking cooling_device10:state=3 effective cool=5000 ... Ok thermal_04.3: checking cooling_device10:state=4 effective cool=6000 ... Ok thermal_04.4: checking cooling_device10:state=5 effective cool=5000 ... Ok thermal_04.5: checking cooling_device10:state=6 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.6: checking cooling_device10:state=7 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.7: checking cooling_device10:state=8 effective cool=3000 ... Ok thermal_04.8: checking cooling_device10:state=9 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.9: checking cooling_device10:state=10 effective cool=4000 ... Ok thermal_04.0: checking cooling_device11:state=1 effective cool=-2000 ... Err ... ### ### thermal_05: ### test/verify the cpufreq cooling device are clipping the frequencies ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### thermal_05.0: Cannot find cpufreq in cooling_device0...... skip thermal_05.0: Cannot find cpufreq in cooling_device1...... skip thermal_05.0: Cannot find cpufreq in cooling_device2...... skip thermal_05.0: Cannot find cpufreq in cooling_device3...... skip thermal_05.0: Cannot find cpufreq in cooling_device4...... skip thermal_05: skip ### ### thermal_06: ### test/verify that different trip points are crossed when load is maximum ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### thermal_06.0: glmark2 not found... skip thermal_06: skip Thanks Xiang

7 years, 3 months

[PM-QA] question about cputopology_04

by Dai Xiang

Hi! I test with below two cpu to test: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz - Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU S1240 @ 1.60GHz With below action: make -C cpuidle cpuidle_killer make -C cputopology run_tests Both cpu fail with cputopology_04: cputopology_04.0: no cpus directory present... skip cputopology_04: skip I check the code: if ! [ -d /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/cpus ]; then log_skip "no cpus directory present" return fi But i do not really know what this dir mean and do not get detail info fron google. Is that only enable on specified type of cpu? or i miss some config about it? Thanks Xiang

7 years, 4 months

[PM-QA] question about cpuhotplug_06

by Dai Xiang

Hi! I test with below two cpu to test: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz - Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU S1240 @ 1.60GHz With below action: make -C cpuidle cpuidle_killer make -C cpuhotplug run_tests With Xeon, 04/04/06 failed: cpuhotplug_04.0/cpu85: checking affinity is set... Err cpuhotplug_04.1/cpu85: checking offlining a cpu with affinity succeed... Ok cpuhotplug_04.2/cpu85: checking affinity changed... Ok cpuhotplug_04.0/cpu86: checking affinity is set... Err cpuhotplug_04.1/cpu86: checking offlining a cpu with affinity succeed... Ok cpuhotplug_04.2/cpu86: checking affinity changed... Ok cpuhotplug_04.0/cpu87: checking affinity is set... Err cpuhotplug_04.1/cpu87: checking offlining a cpu with affinity succeed... Ok cpuhotplug_04.2/cpu87: checking affinity changed... Ok cpuhotplug_04.0/cpu9: checking affinity is set... Ok cpuhotplug_04.1/cpu9: checking offlining a cpu with affinity succeed... Ok cpuhotplug_04.2/cpu9: checking affinity changed... Ok cpuhotplug_04: fail cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu8: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Err cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu80: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu81: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu82: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu83: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu84: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu85: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu86: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu87: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05.0/cpu9: checking offline processor not found in cpuinfo... Ok cpuhotplug_05: fail cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu8: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Err cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu80: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu81: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu82: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu83: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu84: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu85: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu86: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu87: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06.0/cpu9: checking offline processor not found in interrupts... Ok cpuhotplug_06: fail With Atom cpu, all passed. I google this cpu feather but do not get detail info about it. I wonder the difference between those two cpus and can enable those tests on Xeon if possible. Thanks Xiang

7 years, 4 months

[PM-QA] question about cputopology_04

by Dai Xiang

Hi! I use a kvm based on Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU S1240 @ 1.60GHz Atom cpu to test. The cmd which create vm is qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu host. Only cputopology_04 skip: ### cputopology_01: ### test the topology is implemented in the kernel ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cputopology_01.0/cpu0: checking topology is enabled... Ok cputopology_01.0/cpu1: checking topology is enabled... Ok cputopology_01.0/cpu2: checking topology is enabled... Ok cputopology_01.0/cpu3: checking topology is enabled... Ok cputopology_01: pass ### ### cputopology_02: ### test the topology files are present ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cputopology_02.0/cpu0: checking 'core_id' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.1/cpu0: checking 'core_siblings' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.2/cpu0: checking 'core_siblings_list' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.3/cpu0: checking 'physical_package_id' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.4/cpu0: checking 'thread_siblings' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.5/cpu0: checking 'thread_siblings_list' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.0/cpu1: checking 'core_id' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.1/cpu1: checking 'core_siblings' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.2/cpu1: checking 'core_siblings_list' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.3/cpu1: checking 'physical_package_id' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.4/cpu1: checking 'thread_siblings' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.5/cpu1: checking 'thread_siblings_list' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.0/cpu2: checking 'core_id' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.1/cpu2: checking 'core_siblings' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.2/cpu2: checking 'core_siblings_list' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.3/cpu2: checking 'physical_package_id' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.4/cpu2: checking 'thread_siblings' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.5/cpu2: checking 'thread_siblings_list' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.0/cpu3: checking 'core_id' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.1/cpu3: checking 'core_siblings' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.2/cpu3: checking 'core_siblings_list' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.3/cpu3: checking 'physical_package_id' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.4/cpu3: checking 'thread_siblings' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/topology'... Ok cputopology_02.5/cpu3: checking 'thread_siblings_list' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/topology'... Ok cputopology_02: pass ### ### cputopology_03: ### test that the sched_domain files are present and show the topology related flags ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cputopology_03.0/cpu0: checking sched_domain_flags (domain 0)... Ok domain0 flag 0x102f domain0 share cpu capacity flag not set domain0 share power domain flag not set domain0 share cpu package resources flag not set cputopology_03.0/cpu1: checking sched_domain_flags (domain 0)... Ok domain0 flag 0x102f domain0 share cpu capacity flag not set domain0 share power domain flag not set domain0 share cpu package resources flag not set cputopology_03.0/cpu2: checking sched_domain_flags (domain 0)... Ok domain0 flag 0x102f domain0 share cpu capacity flag not set domain0 share power domain flag not set domain0 share cpu package resources flag not set cputopology_03.0/cpu3: checking sched_domain_flags (domain 0)... Ok domain0 flag 0x102f domain0 share cpu capacity flag not set domain0 share power domain flag not set domain0 share cpu package resources flag not set cputopology_03: pass ### ### cputopology_04: ### Test capacity calculation (this is based on the algorithm in arch/arm/kernel/topology.c), make sure that the information in /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/cpus corresponds to that reported by the kernel log. ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cputopology_04.0: no cpus directory present... skip <=== cputopology_04: skip The skip reason is that there is not /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/cpus. But i do not find how to enable this. Could you help me? Thanks Xiang

7 years, 4 months

[PM-QA] question about cpufreq subtest

by Dai Xiang

Hi! I test with below two cpu to test: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8890 v4 @ 2.20GHz - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz With below action: make -C cpuidle cpuidle_killer make -C cpufreq run_tests And only cpufreq_02 and cpufreq_03 can pass. Log as below(ignore pass part): make: Entering directory '/lkp/benchmarks/pm-qa/cpufreq' ### ### cpufreq_01: ### test the cpufreq framework is available for frequency ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cpufreq_01.0/cpu0: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq'... Err cpufreq_01.0/cpu1: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq'... Err cpufreq_01.0/cpu10: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpufreq'... Err ### ### cpufreq_04: ### test the change of the frequency is effective in 'userspace' mode ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cpufreq_04.0: userspace not supported... skip cpufreq_04: skip ### ### cpufreq_05: ### test 'ondemand' and 'conservative' trigger correctly the configuration directory ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cpufreq_05.0: ondemand not supported... skip cpufreq_05.1: conservative not supported... skip cpufreq_05.2: userspace not supported... skip cpufreq_05.3: checking 'ondemand' directory exists... Err cpufreq_05.4: checking 'conservative' directory exists... Err cpufreq_05: fail ### ### cpufreq_06: ### test the change of the frequencies affect the performances of a test program ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cpufreq_06.0: userspace not supported... skip ### ### cpufreq_07: ### test the load of the cpu affects the frequency with 'ondemand' ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cpufreq_07.0: ondemand not supported... skip ### ### cpufreq_08: ### test the load of the cpu does not affect the frequency with 'userspace' ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cpufreq_08.0: userspace not supported... skip ### ### cpufreq_09: ### test the load of the cpu does not affect the frequency with 'powersave' ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Resources/TestSuite/P… ### cpufreq_09.0/cpu0: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1200000 KHz... Err cpufreq_09.1/cpu0: checking 'powersave' frequency 1200000 KHz is fixed... Err cpufreq_09.0/cpu1: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1200000 KHz... Err cpufreq_09.1/cpu1: checking 'powersave' frequency 1200000 KHz is fixed... Err cpufreq_09.0/cpu10: checking 'powersave' sets frequency to 1200000 KHz... Err I check cpus and make sure two cpus can support cpufreq refer to https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt. Do i miss something important or this subtest can not all pass with Intel cpu? Thanks Xiang

7 years, 4 months

ci.linaro.org reboot

by Fathi Boudra

Hi, ci.linaro.org is currently unresponsive and the service requires to be restarted. It's an unscheduled reboot, sorry for the short notice and inconvenience. Cheers, -- Fathi Boudra Technical Lead | Builds and Baselines, Release Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs

7 years, 4 months

review.linaro.org scheduled maintenance

by Ben Copeland

Hello All, On 22/07/17 from 10:00 to 15:00 UTC, review.linaro.org is going to be offline for a Gerrit upgrade. We will be moving to the latest version (2.14), which will bring in some new features and improvements. Regards Ben

7 years, 5 months

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
434
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-dev