On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:43 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable() for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again. In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime functions, those functions need not be called from device remove.
This patch fixes following run time error with pl330 driver.
dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable! dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: failed to get runtime pm
Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy giridhar.maruthy@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera tushar.behera@linaro.org
Looks fine to me. Do you want these to go thru slave-dma or samsung tree.
Hi Vinod,
I think, this patch can be sent to upstream via slave-dma tree and second one via Samsung tree separately and you can add my and Boojin Kim's ack(actually, she replied) on this when you apply.
Okay, I have applied this one only