Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:16:55PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:59:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Adding Jiri and Steven to the CC list.
Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:50:31PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov escreveu:
On 05/15/2012 07:51 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:27:39PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov escreveu:
are there any thoughts on how much of the perf.data is portable and how much it should be? I'm interesting in recording scheduler activity on one machine and then replaying on another. As I can see, replaying x86 perf.data on ARM doesn't work. At least, should it work with a small subset of recorded events (for example, sched:sched_switch, sched:sched_process_exit, sched:sched_process_fork, sched:sched_wakeup and sched:sched_migrate_task) on the same architecture?
Endianness issues? ARM EB? There are some patches by Jiri Olsa that may help you if that is the case.
latest version sent today, there's description of tests I did: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133715172512742&w=2
Each time I run new sort of test, another endianity issue is hit. so, tracepoints.. I'll check ;)
The tracepoints part is a different problem, I think, but take a look anyway ;-)
- Arnaldo