On 23 May 2013 11:43, Nicolas Dechesne nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Fathi Boudra fathi.boudra@linaro.org wrote:
That's something to discuss... We don't have "customers". The engineering builds are done to support our engineering effort, in the fastest and cost effective way The hwpack concept is still valid but not as it used to be (hardware specific abstraction). We still want to have a single hwpack that works for the supported distributions.
"We still want" - Well I'd like to see the list of "we" ;)
As you know, I'm in the list and I'm also the one doing the work so I guess my vote counts ;)
well, as far as I am concerned and for my project i don't think that using hwpack will make sense, and would prefer to go with an OE native approach, even though we will support multiple BSP/SoC, that will be managed with dedicated BSP layers. I will participate in the hwpacks v4 discussions at connect though to align with you guys.
Your call (not only ;) I suspect your project has some stakeholders requirements around OE native approach). I'm guessing you'll have to make some adjustments if you want to submit your pre-built images jobs to LAVA.