26 Apr
2012
26 Apr
'12
6 a.m.
On Tue, April 17, 2012 12:17 am, Shawn Guo wrote:
On 17 April 2012 11:50, Turquette, Mike mturquette@ti.com wrote:
That is a good question. I think it is worth waiting on Saravana's patch which exposes non-private members of struct clk via struct clk_hw. This will have an effect on both platform clock data and code.
Saravana,
(*nudge*) (*nudge*) goes to you now :)
Done! I especially like how it turned out.
-Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.