On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:24:05AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
Have you tried to pass this param from kernel cmdline? What's the syntax if we want to pass a 800 MHz max_freq?
clk-reg-cpufreq.max_freq=800000
Thanks. I was mistaken on the module name.
### cpufreq_05: ### test 'ondemand' and 'conservative' trigger correctly the configuration directory ### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpufreq... ### cpufreq_05.0: checking 'ondemand' directory exists... pass cpufreq_05.1: checking 'conservative' directory exists... pass cpufreq_05.2: checking 'ondemand' directory is not there... pass cpufreq_05.3: checking 'conservative' directory is not there... pass cpufreq_05.4: checking 'ondemand' directory exists... fail cpufreq_05.5: checking 'conservative' directory exists... pass
I past fail part script here: switch_ondemand cpu0 switch_conservative cpu1 check "'ondemand' directory exists" "test -d $CPU_PATH/cpufreq/ondemand" check "'conservative' directory exists" "test -d $CPU_PATH/cpufreq/conservative" This driver assume all cpu cores to share the same freq and voltage. The affected cpu is all other cpus. They also share one single governor. The test case does not suit this driver and not for most arm multi-core cpus I guess.
Then this is the feedback that Linaro PMWG wants to have, I guess.
Here is my tag on this patch.
Acked-by: Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org