23 Mar
2012
23 Mar
'12
9:33 p.m.
On 03/20/2012 08:10 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On 03/20/2012 04:53 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
It does make me wonder if it would be a good idea to pass in the parent rate for .set_parent, which is analogous to .set_rate in many ways.
I need to think a bit more about this.
I was thinking about this. I think the common clock fwk should let the set_parent ops "return" the rate of the clock in addition to passing the rate of the parent in.
Say this is a divider clock and some one changes the parent. The cached "rate" of the clock in the clock fwk is no longer correct. So, the clock fwk should also add a "*new_rate" param to set parent ops.
Thanks, Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.