24 Oct
2012
24 Oct
'12
6:35 a.m.
On 24 October 2012 06:03, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
On Tuesday 23 of October 2012 10:55:51 Viresh Kumar wrote:
@Rafael: Most of these are due to mixed use of u64 and cputime64_t. Both of which are u64 if i am not wrong. Any specific reason that we used cputime64_t instead of u64? Or can i make everything u64 instead in governors?
Well, there might be a reason in the past, but I'm not sure it's still there. :-)
I _think_ you can use u64 everywhere. It would be more correct than the current situation anyway.
Great. I will send another set for these warnings..
-- viresh