16 May
2012
16 May
'12
7:39 p.m.
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 19:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
for ppc64(record) vs x86_64(report) I got following report on latest tip:
[jolsa@dhcp-26-214 test]$ ../perf report > report.target Endianness of raw data not corrected! Warning: 718 samples with id not present in the header Warning: The perf.data file has no samples!
What does perf script give you. It looks like Frederic took my code for this when he ported the original parse-events over to perf. I see the setup of these variables in tools/perf/util/trace-event-read.c
If you run 'perf script' on x86 from a ppc perf.dat file, do you still get the same errors?
-- Steve