The skia code is also hold in the chromium project. I used chromium web browser to check the skia performance with some browser benchmarks.
I think pixman is also a good candidate for skia to benchmark toolchain.
Regards, Jammy
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jim Huang jim.huang@linaro.org wrote:
On 1 March 2011 10:45, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote: [...]
I'd like to use Skia as a toolchain benchmark but the upstream seems a bit messy. I'm using this export: http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/skia-0~svn788.tar.xz
hi Michael,
Thanks for your interest!
from http://code.google.com/p/skia/ which I then build and run using these rules:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-toolchain-dev/cbuild/trunk/view/head:/li...
The code.google version seems a bit broken. autoconf scripts are included but they don't work. The non-autoconf Makefile assumes Intel with SSE2. The Android Skia seems to be a fork from some time ago and uses build scripts that are tightly tied into the Android build system.
Yes, don't use autotool inside skia package.
What's the best version to use? I'd like to standardise across Linaro for benchmarking so that results can be compared across groups, or at least so we don't get confused.
The skia maintainer, Mike Reed, made two branches: one is hosted in Google Code, and another is inside Android source tree: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/external/skia.git%3Ba=summary
I would suggest to use the later.
Also, here is my previous testing results:
http://groups.google.com/group/0xlab-devel/browse_thread/thread/f76d8af5b01b...
Sincerely, -jserv
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev