On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Dave Pigott dave.pigott@linaro.org wrote:
Hi all,
I was just discussing IPv6 with Philip Colmer, our new IT Services Manager (cc'd on this mail), and it strikes me that we should at least be considering dual running at some point in the future, i.e. providing both v4 and v6. I'm not clear what the ramifications are, or as yet whether Zen will support it. Philip has experience with this, and seems to remember that Zen do support it, but I'll bang an e-mail out to them to check.
The reason for this e-mail is to start a discussion as to whether we think it's worth raising a BP, or if we can ignore this issue.
Thoughts, comments and brickbats welcome.
I am quite sure that supporting IPv6 inside the LAVA lab is a worthwhile thing to do...
Whether we need public IPv6 or not, I don't have any strong feelings. I see that IPv6 is probably modern; so if it comes more or less for free I would say: let's think through this, make a plan and decide.
Thanks
Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation