On Friday, June 29, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/28/2012 09:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi.
This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the notifier of intel_idle. This patch has the benefit of encapsulating the intel_idle driver and remove some exported functions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
This one looks good to me too.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl
Thanks for the review Rafael.
Len, are you going to take it?
Rafael, Len,
After the discussion [1], I put in place a tree at:
ssh://git.linaro.org/srv/git.linaro.org/git/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git #cpuidle-next
I proposed this tree to group the cpuidle modifications and prevent the last minutes conflict when Len will apply them.
I also included the tree into linux-next for wider testing.
I can't speak for Len, but I'm not sure he'll like this.
Anyway, you seem to have the same material as Len in that tree, won't there be any conflicts in linux-next?
Rafael