"Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" paul.liu@linaro.org writes:
Hi,
From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" paul.liu@linaro.org
Add DA9052 PMIC support for Freescale QuickStart Loco board. The model of PMIC on QuickStart Loco board is "da9053-aa".
Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul.liu@linaro.org Cc: Amit Kucheria amit.kucheria@canonical.com Cc: Sascha Hauer kernel@pengutronix.de
arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_loco.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h | 10 +++- 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_loco.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_loco.c index fd8b524..61dd8c9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_loco.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx53_loco.c @@ -23,10 +23,21 @@ #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/irq.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h> +#include <linux/regulator/fixed.h> +#include <linux/mfd/da9052/da9052.h> +#include <linux/mfd/da9052/pdata.h> #include <mach/common.h> #include <mach/hardware.h> #include <mach/iomux-mx53.h> +#include <mach/irqs.h> +#include <mach/gpio.h> #include <asm/mach-types.h> #include <asm/mach/arch.h> @@ -45,6 +56,32 @@ #define LOCO_SD1_CD IMX_GPIO_NR(3, 13) #define LOCO_ACCEL_EN IMX_GPIO_NR(6, 14) +#define DA9052_LDO1_VOLT_UPPER 1800 +#define DA9052_LDO1_VOLT_LOWER 600 +#define DA9052_LDO1_VOLT_STEP 50 +#define DA9052_LDO2_VOLT_UPPER 1800 +#define DA9052_LDO2_VOLT_LOWER 600 +#define DA9052_LDO2_VOLT_STEP 25 +#define DA9052_LDO34_VOLT_UPPER 3300 +#define DA9052_LDO34_VOLT_LOWER 1725 +#define DA9052_LDO34_VOLT_STEP 25 +#define DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_UPPER 3600 +#define DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_LOWER 1200 +#define DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_STEP 50 +#define DA9052_LDO9_VOLT_STEP 50 +#define DA9052_LDO9_VOLT_LOWER 1250 +#define DA9052_LDO9_VOLT_UPPER 3650 +/* Buck Config Validation Macros */ +#define DA9052_BUCK_CORE_PRO_VOLT_UPPER 2075 +#define DA9052_BUCK_CORE_PRO_VOLT_LOWER 500 +#define DA9052_BUCK_CORE_PRO_STEP 25 +#define DA9052_BUCK_MEM_VOLT_UPPER 2500 +#define DA9052_BUCK_MEM_VOLT_LOWER 925 +#define DA9052_BUCK_MEM_STEP 25 +#define DA9052_BUCK_PERI_VOLT_UPPER 2500 +#define DA9052_BUCK_PERI_VOLT_LOWER 925 +#define DA9052_BUCK_PERI_STEP 25
The _STEP #defines looks unused. What about removing them ?
static iomux_v3_cfg_t mx53_loco_pads[] = { /* FEC */ MX53_PAD_FEC_MDC__FEC_MDC, @@ -227,6 +264,93 @@ static const struct esdhc_platform_data mx53_loco_sd3_data __initconst = { .wp_type = ESDHC_WP_GPIO, }; +#define DA9052_LDO(max, min, rname, suspend_mv) \ +{\
- .constraints = {\
.name = (rname), \
.max_uV = (max) * 1000,\
.min_uV = (min) * 1000,\
.valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE\
|REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS | REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE,\
.valid_modes_mask = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,\
.state_mem = { \
.uV = suspend_mv * 1000, \
.mode = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL, \
.enabled = (0 == suspend_mv) ? 0 : 1, \
.disabled = 0, \
}, \
- },\
+}
+/* currently the suspend_mv here takes no effects for DA9053 +preset-voltage have to be done in the latest stage during +suspend*/ +static struct regulator_init_data da9052_regulators_init[] = {
- /* BUCKS */
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_BUCK_CORE_PRO_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_BUCK_CORE_PRO_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_BUCK_CORE",
850),
You're using some #define for min/max. Why not for suspend_mv ? Also, if #defines are similar enough, I guess you can go further with something like (untested) : #define DA9052_LDO(prefix, rname) \ {\ .constraints = {\ .name = (rname), \ .max_uV = (prefix ## _VOLT_UPPER) * 1000,\ .min_uV = (prefix ## _VOLT_LOWER) * 1000,\ .valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE\ |REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS | REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE,\ .valid_modes_mask = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL,\ .state_mem = { \ .uV = (prefix ## _VOLT_SUSP) * 1000, \ .mode = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL, \ .enabled = (0 == (prefix ## _VOLT_SUSP)) ? 0 : 1, \ .disabled = 0, \ }, \ },\ }
and then:
DA9052(DA9052_BUCK_CORE_PRO, "DA9052_BUCK_CORE"),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_BUCK_CORE_PRO_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_BUCK_CORE_PRO_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_BUCK_PRO", 950),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_BUCK_MEM_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_BUCK_MEM_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_BUCK_MEM", 1500),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_BUCK_PERI_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_BUCK_PERI_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_BUCK_PERI", 2500),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO1_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO1_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO1", 1300),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO2_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO2_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO2", 1300),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO34_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO34_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO3", 3300),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO34_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO34_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO4", 2775),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO5", 1300),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO6", 1200),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO7", 2750),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO8", 1800),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO9_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO9_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO9", 2500),
- DA9052_LDO(DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_UPPER,
DA9052_LDO567810_VOLT_LOWER, "DA9052_LDO10", 1200),
+};
+#define MX53_LOCO_DA9052_IRQ (6*32 + 11) /* GPIO7_11 */
you're aware that there's a IMX_GPIO_NR() macro for defining gpio, right ? Moreover, why not putting it with other #defines for gpio in the top of the file ?
+static int __init loco_da9052_init(struct da9052 *da9052) +{
- /* Configuring for DA9052 interrupt servce */
- /* s3c_gpio_setpull(DA9052_IRQ_PIN, S3C_GPIO_PULL_UP); */
- /* Set interrupt as LOW LEVEL interrupt source */
- irq_set_irq_type(gpio_to_irq(MX53_LOCO_DA9052_IRQ),
IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW);
- return 0;
+}
+static struct da9052_pdata __initdata da9052_plat = {
- .init = loco_da9052_init,
- .irq_base = MXC_PMIC_IRQ_START,
- .regulators = {
&da9052_regulators_init[0],
&da9052_regulators_init[1],
&da9052_regulators_init[2],
&da9052_regulators_init[3],
&da9052_regulators_init[4],
&da9052_regulators_init[5],
&da9052_regulators_init[6],
&da9052_regulators_init[7],
&da9052_regulators_init[8],
&da9052_regulators_init[9],
&da9052_regulators_init[10],
&da9052_regulators_init[11],
&da9052_regulators_init[12],
&da9052_regulators_init[13],
- },
+};
static inline void mx53_loco_fec_reset(void) { int ret; @@ -273,6 +397,10 @@ static struct i2c_board_info mx53loco_i2c_devices[] = { { I2C_BOARD_INFO("mma8450", 0x1C), },
- {
I2C_BOARD_INFO("da9053-aa", 0x90 >> 1),
.platform_data = &da9052_plat,
- },
}; static void __init mx53_loco_board_init(void) diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h index fd9efb0..9fb56eb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h @@ -53,7 +53,15 @@ #endif /* REVISIT: Add IPU irqs on IMX51 */ -#define NR_IRQS (MXC_IPU_IRQ_START + MX3_IPU_IRQS) +#define MXC_PMIC_IRQ_START (MXC_IPU_IRQ_START + MX3_IPU_IRQS)
+#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_MX53_LOCO +#define MXC_PMIC_IRQS 32 +#else +#define MXC_PMIC_IRQS 0 +#endif
So, each board using a pmic needing some irqs will need to add a #ifdef/#define combo ? Can it be made more generic ? How will it work with a kernel compiled for several machines, say loco and an other using a pmic using more than 32 irqs ?
+#define NR_IRQS (MXC_PMIC_IRQ_START + MXC_PMIC_IRQS) extern int imx_irq_set_priority(unsigned char irq, unsigned char prio);
Regards, Arnaud