On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 20:30 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On 11/14/2012 08:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 19:06 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Or course, once Linaro's build and test infrastructure supports config fragments fully, then we could have have separate config fragments for
- basic board config
- new board enablement
Not sure if I follow this 100%... Can I have an example of "new board enablement" vs "basic board config" config fragment?
I guess "basic board config" == config for features in Linus Torvald's tree. "new board enablement" == config for things only in LT tree. For us that's TC2 power managemnt and various drivers. Probably, most of the time the config for this extra stuff in LT trees is harmless (i.e. just gives KConfig warnings) but I imagine there might be things which would break llct.
This makes sense. I see. The "new board enablement" is not for the "board configs" topic for llct then.
It's not.