12 Oct
2011
12 Oct
'11
9:12 p.m.
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:55:24 +0200, Alexander Sack asac@linaro.org wrote:
Do we really need this kind detail encoded in the the state of a WI itself?
Alternatively, we could always add a comment to the white board to document what happened with POSTPONED work items.
I agree with Alexander here, I think we can do without this state.
Would anyone object to me changing those workitems with that state to POSTPONED?
Thanks,
James