2011/8/19 Michal Nazarewicz mina86@mina86.com:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:28:25 +0200, Per Forlin per.forlin@stericsson.com wrote:
@@ -3605,6 +3608,9 @@ static int __init fsg_init(void) int rc; struct fsg_dev *fsg;
- if (!FSG_NUM_BUFFERS_IS_VALID(fsg_num_buffers))
Care to add pr_err() here? Or better yet, change fsg_num_buffers_is_valid() to a function, eg.:
static inline int fsg_num_buffers_validate() { if (fsg_num_buffers && fsg_num_buffers <= 4) return 0; pr_err("fsg_num_buffers too high: %u\n", fsg_num_buffers); return -EINVAL; }
Look good. This will permit only 1 buffer to be used. Is this intentionally? I'm fine with it. In Kconfig the range is 2 to 4. For debug purposes there may be a point of permitting range 1 to 4.
- return -EINVAL;
if ((rc = fsg_alloc()) != 0) return rc; fsg = the_fsg;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/mass_storage.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/mass_storage.c index d3eb274..fa6dedf 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/mass_storage.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/mass_storage.c @@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); static int __init msg_init(void) {
- if (!FSG_NUM_BUFFERS_IS_VALID(fsg_num_buffers))
- return -EINVAL;
return usb_composite_probe(&msg_driver, msg_bind); } module_init(msg_init); diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c index 8c7b747..5f146da 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/multi.c @@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ static struct usb_composite_driver multi_driver = { static int __init multi_init(void) {
- if (!FSG_NUM_BUFFERS_IS_VALID(fsg_num_buffers))
- return -EINVAL;
return usb_composite_probe(&multi_driver, multi_bind); } module_init(multi_init);
I'd move the check from those two places to fsg_common_init().
good point.
Other then the above minor comments and buffers never being freed in f_mass_storage.c, the code looks good to me.
I'll fix these and send out a new version.
Many thanks, Per