Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:

I actually don't agree with that, becuase the Nathan's apprach shows the reasoning that leads to the RCU introduction quite clearly. So if you don't have technical problems with the patchset, I'm going to take it as is.

Great!!

Okay.. I don't have any technical problems with it, i reviewed most of it carefully. The only pending thing is rebase on linux-next, after that i can give my ack for it.