On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
From ac60fe289eef3d81009f2b14a12acbac3e71878b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Antipov dmitry.antipov@linaro.org Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:05:27 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] ohci-hcd: use usleep_range() instead of mdelay()
drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c index b263919..a6d58da 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c @@ -574,6 +574,7 @@ static int ohci_run (struct ohci_hcd *ohci) u32 mask, val; int first = ohci->fminterval == 0; struct usb_hcd *hcd = ohci_to_hcd(ohci);
unsigned long usecs;
disable (ohci);
@@ -724,7 +725,8 @@ retry: spin_unlock_irq (&ohci->lock);
// POTPGT delay is bits 24-31, in 2 ms units.
- mdelay ((val >> 23) & 0x1fe);
usecs = ((val >> 23) & 0x1fe) * USEC_PER_MSEC;
usleep_range(usecs, usecs + 1000); hcd->state = HC_STATE_RUNNING;
if (quirk_zfmicro(ohci)) {
Why not simply use msleep()?
Alan Stern