24 Jan
2011
24 Jan
'11
9:47 p.m.
On 24 January 2011 20:49, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hudson@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:22:45 +0000, Jamie Bennett jamie.bennett@linaro.org wrote:
The current thoughts are to increase the package count and download size by adding a number of developer focused packages.
Once we have the smaller image and this developer image (both of which I see the need for), what is the use case for the current headless image?
Basically Headless would go away. These two images are being proposed to replace the Headless image which is neither small nor feature-ful. Hopefully the new images will address the specific needs of two different target audiences better.
Cheers, mwh
Regards, Jamie.