On 05/15/2013 05:02 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 14:41 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 15 May 2013 14:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) tixy@linaro.org wrote:
I see that the ARM version is following the pattern of SPARC64 and X86 SSSE3 in how it is configured, so for fear of opening a can of worms, perhaps it's simpler if we just go with the linaro-base.conf patch which started this thread? :-)
Yes please!
I've just spotted that you have posted a fix to the ARM SHA1 code [1] so perhaps we shouldn't enable it until that fix works its way into the Linaro tree? (If it's important for Linaro work the perhaps you could ask Andrey to add the patch to the Linaro tree early.)
- added the "ARM: crypto: sha1-armv4-large.S: fix SP handling" patch to linux-linaro-core-tracking tree starting from tag llct-20130515.1
Thanks, Andrey
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-May/168374.html