Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9

On Thursday, February 07, 2013 06:52:20 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:

On 7 February 2013 18:35, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:

...

I think they all make sense, so applied to linux-next.

I would prefer not to make any more changes to cpufreq before v3.9 from now on, except for fixes and maybe the Drik's patchset that I kind of scheduled for

Dirk :)

Yes, sorry Dirk.

...

merging into bleeding-edge later today.

I probably have few more for you. Some sparse warnings to be fixed for Dirks work and an dangling exynos patch which is waiting for your reply :)

Which Exynos patch?

BTW, there still are locking problems in linux-next. Why do we need to take cpufreq_driver_lock() around driver->init() in cpufreq_add_dev(), in particular?

Rafael