On 10/22/2012 02:02 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote: [...]
+static irqreturn_t prcmu_low_irq_handler(int irq, void *irq_data) +{
struct db8500_thermal_zone *pzone = irq_data;
struct db8500_thsens_platform_data *ptrips;
unsigned long next_low, next_high;
unsigned int idx;
ptrips = pzone->trip_tab;
idx = pzone->cur_index;
if (unlikely(idx == 0))
/* Meaningless for thermal management, ignoring it */
return IRQ_HANDLED;
if (idx == 1) {
next_high = ptrips->trip_points[0].temp;
next_low = PRCMU_DEFAULT_LOW_TEMP;
} else {
next_high = ptrips->trip_points[idx-1].temp;
next_low = ptrips->trip_points[idx-2].temp;
}
pzone->cur_index -= 1;
pzone->cur_temp_pseudo = (next_high + next_low)/2;
prcmu_stop_temp_sense();
prcmu_config_hotmon((u8)(next_low/1000), (u8)(next_high/1000));
prcmu_start_temp_sense(PRCMU_DEFAULT_MEASURE_TIME);
pr_debug("PRCMU set max %ld, set min %ld\n", next_high, next_low);
pzone->trend = THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING;
schedule_work(&pzone->therm_work);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+static irqreturn_t prcmu_high_irq_handler(int irq, void *irq_data) +{
struct db8500_thermal_zone *pzone = irq_data;
struct db8500_thsens_platform_data *ptrips;
unsigned long next_low, next_high;
unsigned int idx;
ptrips = pzone->trip_tab;
idx = pzone->cur_index;
if (idx < ptrips->num_trips - 1) {
next_high = ptrips->trip_points[idx+1].temp;
next_low = ptrips->trip_points[idx].temp;
pzone->cur_index += 1;
pzone->cur_temp_pseudo = (next_high + next_low)/2;
prcmu_stop_temp_sense();
prcmu_config_hotmon((u8)(next_low/1000), (u8)(next_high/1000));
prcmu_start_temp_sense(PRCMU_DEFAULT_MEASURE_TIME);
pr_debug("PRCMU set max %ld, min %ld\n", next_high, next_low);
}
if (idx == ptrips->num_trips - 1)
} else if ()
There is no else condition here, because it it the highest critical trip point, system will be shut down in thermal_work. But I'd like to add some comments here to state this situation.
I didn't mean adding a new else condition, what I meant is that if the first condition (idx < ptrips->num_trips - 1) is verified, then there is no need to check for the second condition (idx == ptrips->num_trips - 1). So I was thinking of changing the code to:
if (idx < ptrips->num_trips - 1) ... else if (idx == ptrips->num_trips - 1) ...
Sorry if I wasn't clear.
pzone->cur_temp_pseudo = ptrips->trip_points[idx].temp + 1;
pzone->trend = THERMAL_TREND_RAISING;
schedule_work(&pzone->therm_work);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+static void db8500_thermal_work(struct work_struct *work) +{
enum thermal_device_mode cur_mode;
struct db8500_thermal_zone *pzone;
pzone = container_of(work, struct db8500_thermal_zone, therm_work);
mutex_lock(&pzone->th_lock);
cur_mode = pzone->mode;
mutex_unlock(&pzone->th_lock);
if (cur_mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED) {
pr_warn("Warning: thermal function disabled.\n");
return;
}
thermal_zone_device_update(pzone->therm_dev);
pr_debug("db8500_thermal_work finished.\n");
+}
+static int __devinit db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{
struct db8500_thermal_zone *pzone = NULL;
struct db8500_thsens_platform_data *ptrips;
int low_irq, high_irq, ret = 0;
unsigned long dft_low, dft_high;
pzone = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
sizeof(struct db8500_thermal_zone), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pzone)
return -ENOMEM;
pzone->thsens_pdev = pdev;
low_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "IRQ_HOTMON_LOW");
if (low_irq < 0) {
pr_err("Get IRQ_HOTMON_LOW failed.\n");
return low_irq;
}
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, low_irq, NULL,
prcmu_low_irq_handler,
IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT, "dbx500_temp_low", pzone);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("Failed to allocate temp low irq.\n");
return ret;
}
high_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "IRQ_HOTMON_HIGH");
if (high_irq < 0) {
pr_err("Get IRQ_HOTMON_HIGH failed.\n");
return high_irq;
}
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, high_irq, NULL,
prcmu_high_irq_handler,
IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT, "dbx500_temp_high", pzone);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("Failed to allocate temp high irq.\n");
return ret;
}
pzone->low_irq = low_irq;
pzone->high_irq = high_irq;
pzone->mode = THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED;
mutex_init(&pzone->th_lock);
INIT_WORK(&pzone->therm_work, db8500_thermal_work);
ptrips = pdev->dev.platform_data;
pzone->trip_tab = ptrips;
pzone->therm_dev = thermal_zone_device_register("db8500_thermal_zone",
ptrips->num_trips, 0, pzone, &thdev_ops, 0, 0);
if (IS_ERR(pzone->therm_dev)) {
pr_err("Failed to register thermal zone device\n");
return PTR_ERR(pzone->therm_dev);
}
dft_low = PRCMU_DEFAULT_LOW_TEMP;
dft_high = ptrips->trip_points[0].temp;
prcmu_stop_temp_sense();
prcmu_config_hotmon((u8)(dft_low/1000), (u8)(dft_high/1000));
prcmu_start_temp_sense(PRCMU_DEFAULT_MEASURE_TIME);
pzone->cur_index = 0;
pzone->cur_temp_pseudo = (dft_low + dft_high)/2;
pzone->trend = THERMAL_TREND_STABLE;
All the stuff from prcmu_stop_temp_sense() up to this line can race with the irq handlers, I would suggest doing it before requesting the irqs.
pzone->mode = THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED;
Shouldn't this be protected by pzone->th_lock? Otherwise it should be set before the thermal zone is registered.
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pzone);
return 0;
+}
+static int __devexit db8500_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{
struct db8500_thermal_zone *pzone;
pzone = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
cancel_work_sync(&pzone->therm_work);
if (pzone->therm_dev)
thermal_zone_device_unregister(pzone->therm_dev);
return 0;
+}
mutex_destroy() should be called on pzone->th_lock
+static int db8500_thermal_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
pm_message_t state)
+{
struct db8500_thermal_zone *pzone;
pzone = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
flush_work_sync(&pzone->therm_work);
prcmu_stop_temp_sense();
return 0;
+}
+static int db8500_thermal_resume(struct platform_device *pdev) +{
struct db8500_thermal_zone *pzone;
struct db8500_thsens_platform_data *ptrips;
unsigned long dft_low, dft_high;
pzone = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
ptrips = pzone->trip_tab;
dft_low = PRCMU_DEFAULT_LOW_TEMP;
dft_high = ptrips->trip_points[0].temp;
prcmu_config_hotmon((u8)(dft_low/1000), (u8)(dft_high/1000));
prcmu_start_temp_sense(PRCMU_DEFAULT_MEASURE_TIME);
Shouldn't cur_index and cur_temp_pseudo be updated as well? You may want to define a helper function with all the code shared by irq handlers (both high and low), probe and resume.
No, they cannot be update because we don't know the actual current temp[1] after short or long time suspend, everything goes as beginning.
That's what I wanted to say, if everything is reset to a default value, then cur_index and cur_temp should be reset too, as it's done in the probe function. Otherwise you may have a current pseudo-temp and a current index unrelated to how the hotmon is configured.
If a helper function is introduced, it can be only used in probe and resume I think, different and a bit complicated algorithm in irq handlers.
I was thinking about a function which takes the new index and the new low and high parameters, and updates cur_index and cur_pseudo_temp and does the prcmu stuff. It seems to me this is (or should be) common to all the 4 functions.
[1] due to lack of corresponding interface, search "TODO" in this file to get more explanation.
-- Francesco