On 07/27/2012 07:46 AM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 07/25/2012 04:15 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This variable is only used in the in processor_driver.c. This patch reduces the scope of the variable by moving it to this file.
This is true after applying your second patch . Maybe you can check the sequencing of patches in the series. As a thumb rule one should be able to build the kernel by applying each and every patch in the series .
Thanks Deepthi. I think I already git bisect tested the patchset. This patch does not break the build, the variable is defined in the processor_driver.c file.
There would be a build break after applying this one as acpi_idle_driver is still used in processor_idle.c by applying just this patch.
Cheers, Deepthi
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 2 +- include/acpi/processor.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c index 7048b97..017b39d 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_processor_driver = {
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors); EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(processors);
+extern struct cpuidle_driver acpi_idle_driver; struct acpi_processor_errata errata __read_mostly;
/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h index db427fa..8b2c39a 100644 --- a/include/acpi/processor.h +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h @@ -332,7 +332,6 @@ int acpi_processor_power_exit(struct acpi_processor *pr, struct acpi_device *device); int acpi_processor_suspend(struct device *dev); int acpi_processor_resume(struct device *dev); -extern struct cpuidle_driver acpi_idle_driver;
/* in processor_thermal.c */ int acpi_processor_get_limit_info(struct acpi_processor *pr);