On 02/03/11 at 09:52pm, Michael Hope wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Peter Maydell peter.maydell@linaro.org wrote:
On 2 March 2011 01:33, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Peter Maydell peter.maydell@linaro.org wrote:
That would be an annoying format change for toolchain group releases, which are already on a monthly schedule and currently use "2011.03" for milestone names, and "2011.03-0" (-1, -2 ...) for release versions.
Hi Peter. We'll keep the 2011.xx-y names for the products. Each project has product series and a planning series. The product series are ones like '4.5' or '4.4' for gcc-linaro, and 'trunk' for qemu-linaro, and these then have milestones like '2011.03'.
Is this a proposal to vary the proposed new milestone names, or a suggestion that the toolchain group should continue as it is and not worry about the inconsistency with other groups?
There's no change from our product series/milestone naming point of view. The dates will change to the end of the month to sync up across Linaro. There will be a parallel and, unfortunately, largely identical planning series with milestones as well.
For status.linaro.org to correctly track your Blueprints and Work Items together with the rest of Linaro's outputs they must be targeted to a milestone named like in the wiki page. Status will group all projects together with the same milestone to get a picture of what is due for that date. Targeting Work Items or Blueprints to another milestone will mean they won't show up.
-- Michael
Regards, Jamie.