On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2011 09:11 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2011 05:41 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.orgwrote:
Test 6: do some stress test
for each cpu * for i in 1 .. 50 * set cpuX offline * set cpuX back online
Not sure how evil you want to get with this, but several years back I wrote a simple, but nasty test that picked a cpu at random, and set the state to the opposite of whatever it happened to be at the time. It was completely random, I didn't have anything builtin for record/playback, or doing it in the same sequence for reproducibilty, but it didn't really need it. When it broke things, it usually broke them within just a few minutes.
Ok thanks for the idea, I will add what you suggest.
With cpu0 being a special case?
Yes, cpu0 will be a special case for all the tests.
If only we had a patch for that!
;-)
Mike
http://www.linaro.org/ Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro Facebook | http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg Twitter | http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/ Blog
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOhCJqAAoJEAKBbMCpUGYAS54H/i3g9v2KcNal7zCvshmXFJcZ xX//Np/z+1UCUowTUnV8O80XMgyOT8f0EFR8G+e6niORJk8GIlW2ZlQfIMJOYZyF T4NEJXWYpW5G6FFORJLiAFDvC9VXrj/F2bGZa0NjhaePCmdRTdwlyv2GNJvrO6B/ /3oFpCBRGJ/3P9Pns+hy4ry/7TRkzIHw1OGv4XCbGnS8zQD7hXb1ljkpewReZVdm srY6oLRmL9j+k7WIHMIHXyg+nv0DT8WCGrw32Rz074HJJVJwDo0xo1vEHevp76SW BW6OtoaaiIbRYQgXM2Qbcf7BH0jxmduIfhrchTzQSHWa7K8uaqyLYTUPv9WA/JE= =lL8N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----