4 Feb
2013
4 Feb
'13
12:24 p.m.
On 4 February 2013 17:47, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
Well, [1-2/4] are things I can take for v3.9 no problem. The other two I'd wait for the next cycle to be honest. We already have 30+ cpufreq patches scheduled for v3.9 and some of them quite subtle for that matter.
To be honest, i wanted to get these in 3.9 :) . And that's why hurried on them and got this full series working in a single day of work :)
Anyway, i understand your point and i also believe last two patches require some testing/review before these getting in.
One important point i would like to highlight is: governors directory would be present in cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/ now instead of cpu/cpufreq/.