7 Mar
2012
7 Mar
'12
3:36 p.m.
On 13:45 Wed 07 Mar , Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
+- compatible: Must be "fsl,anatop-regulator" +- vol-bit-shift: Bit shift for the register +- vol-bit-width: Number of bits used in the register +- min-bit-val: Minimum value of this register +- min-voltage: Minimum voltage of this regulator +- max-voltage: Maximum voltage of this regulator
specific properites need to be prefix by the vendor
This really doesn't seem at all sane for a device which is already vendor specific, it's just noise in the bindings.
No it's Here is a good example as we have regulator generic binding & vendor specific bindig
Best Regards, J.