On Thursday, January 31, 2013 07:50:04 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:58:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
With the inclusion of following patches:
9f4eb10 cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary 772b4b1 cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
code redundancy is introduced again. Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Hi,
Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri fabio.baltieri@linaro.org
OK
Fabio, Viresh, Shawn,
This time I was *really* confused as to what patches I was supposed to take, from whom and in what order, so I applied a number of them in the order given by patchwork. That worked well enough, because (almost) all of them applied for me without conflicts. That said I would appreciate it if you could look into the bleeding-edge branch of my tree and see if there's anything missing or something that shouldn't be there (cpufreq-wise).
Thanks, Rafael