On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 27 January 2011 19:35, Angus Ainslie angus.ainslie@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for pointing out that mailing list. Can you have a quick look a the included patch and tell me if you've seen these upstream for the v310. I found a similar one for the v210 but not the v310.
The patch is untested as I haven't received my hardware yet.
Hi Angus,
pdma patch was submitted. The link to the patch is http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg108006.html
I have not seen any patch to change IRQ_EINT(5) trigger level.
defconfig for s5pv310 was deliberately avoided by the maintainer because of linus being unhappy with too many defconfigs. So for s5pv310, the s5pv210_defconfig is used.
As I'd prefer to use patches in the Linaro kernel tree which are as close as possible to upstream including proper authorship attributions, could you direct me to a git repo where I could find them? Alternatively, can you resend them to me? Extracting patches from mailing list archives is not practical.
Nicolas
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:50 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
defconfig for s5pv310 was deliberately avoided by the maintainer because of linus being unhappy with too many defconfigs. So for s5pv310, the s5pv210_defconfig is used.
As I'd prefer to use patches in the Linaro kernel tree which are as close as possible to upstream including proper authorship attributions, could you direct me to a git repo where I could find them? Alternatively, can you resend them to me? Extracting patches from mailing list archives is not practical.
I'd like the landing team to be building this tree for you. Can you work with Angus directly to ensure you get what you need.
Thanks,
Scott
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Scott Bambrough wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:50 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
defconfig for s5pv310 was deliberately avoided by the maintainer because of linus being unhappy with too many defconfigs. So for s5pv310, the s5pv210_defconfig is used.
As I'd prefer to use patches in the Linaro kernel tree which are as close as possible to upstream including proper authorship attributions, could you direct me to a git repo where I could find them? Alternatively, can you resend them to me? Extracting patches from mailing list archives is not practical.
I'd like the landing team to be building this tree for you. Can you work with Angus directly to ensure you get what you need.
Angus did send me a patch directly. For a small amount of trivial patches this is often the easiest solution. I requested that linaro-dev be CC'd for others to see. And then Thomas pointed out that the same patch was already accepted in the Samsung tree, and therefore I'd prefer cherry-picking that one instead. That's where we are now.
I don't mind performing the cherry-pick myself. But I'd appreciate if landing teams (or anyone with the info handy) could do all the digging for commit IDs and repository URLs in that case.
Nicolas