Hi, Dmitry

On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:23:10 +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote:

I remember that this was rejected some time ago. Nevertheless, is it possible to accept this until we will have a better solution?

Why???

Ingo already merged da3789628f88 ("perf tools: Stop using a global trace events description list"). Didn't it solve your problem?

On my tesing, it works well for cross-replay:

$ ./perf sched -i ~/arm/perf.data replay run measurement overhead: 253 nsecs sleep measurement overhead: 55136 nsecs the run test took 1000013 nsecs the sleep test took 1057532 nsecs nr_run_events: 53 nr_sleep_events: 62 nr_wakeup_events: 31 target-less wakeups: 1 task 0 ( <unknown>: 1496), nr_events: 18 task 1 ( perf: 1497), nr_events: 10 task 2 ( ksoftirqd/0: 3), nr_events: 9 task 3 ( kworker/0:1: 280), nr_events: 36 task 4 ( swapper: 0), nr_events: 62 task 5 ( sync_supers: 103), nr_events: 3 task 6 ( init: 1), nr_events: 3 task 7 ( flush-8:0: 560), nr_events: 3 task 8 ( rsyslogd: 1135), nr_events: 3 ------------------------------------------------------------ #1 : 2664.545, ravg: 2664.54, cpu: 3125.45 / 3125.45 #2 : 2664.978, ravg: 2664.59, cpu: 3124.99 / 3125.40 #3 : 2664.736, ravg: 2664.60, cpu: 3125.68 / 3125.43 #4 : 2664.620, ravg: 2664.60, cpu: 3125.96 / 3125.48 #5 : 2665.132, ravg: 2664.66, cpu: 3126.02 / 3125.54 #6 : 2665.096, ravg: 2664.70, cpu: 3083.47 / 3121.33 #7 : 2665.585, ravg: 2664.79, cpu: 3125.66 / 3121.76 #8 : 2664.839, ravg: 2664.79, cpu: 3126.01 / 3122.19 #9 : 2664.750, ravg: 2664.79, cpu: 3125.38 / 3122.51 #10 : 2668.297, ravg: 2665.14, cpu: 3116.82 / 3121.94

Of course, host and arm machine have different id's.

Thanks, Namhyung